@charu: don't worry, I'm not ignoring you, I'm writing something :P I don't think I can sway you, but hopefully it might sway the rest of town or at least give town more information to work with.
@charu: don't worry, I'm not ignoring you, I'm writing something :P I don't think I can sway you, but hopefully it might sway the rest of town or at least give town more information to work with.
So uh...
I still see you in the thread, are you writing a novel or something?
Originally posted by JohnRedWolf87
Charu the red-nosed Snivy
Had a very shiny nose
And if you ever saw it
You could even say it glows
All of the other Snivies
Used to laugh and call him names
They never let poor Charu
Join in any Snivy games
(Click the arrow to see the rest)
Originally posted by Vendetta21
All in all I would say that Charu not only won this game, his play made me reconsider how I play it.
omg I was beginning to think you were opting to be quiet on purpose.
YAAAAAAAAAAAY
Now get lynched or produce something that will sway me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reads list good? Okie dokie!
Charu: I honestly don't think I can sway you and it's either because you're wolf or I feel like you have a really bad case of confirmation bias. Usually, when people accuse me of being wolfy, it's really tempting to point the finger back to them, but I usually have the self-control to not act on my emotions in such a childish way. But the manner in which you've been grinding on me is so frustrating, self-contradictory, and illogical that it's really hard to avoid that temptation because at that point, such action would be justifiable through reason and not emotion.
If it weren't for the fact that (1) there is little time left in the end of the phase, (2) I'm up on the chopping block, and (3) there isn't much traction on you, then I'd probably use this time to make an entire formal case against you. So instead, at least between now and next phase, I'll entertain the idea of you just being a townie sick with a horrible case of confirmation bias. Please get better <3
Danceguy117: I tend to like most of dance's posts. He's been considerate of others ideas while at the same time being able to post new/original ideas. There was one post where he voted for choof that I said I found awkward, which I still find a little awkward, but I think it's more likely than not that there was a minor mishap in interpretation.
The only thing that concerns me is that it seems that a lot of his posts are "newbie friendly"; it might just be me, but at times Pete went a little excessive with it. As a wolf, this would be a very smart thing to do as Pete would likely gain the trust of the newer players while at the same time posting a lot of posts with neutral content.
DFR: A pretty null read at the moment. You've been posting, but I feel like I haven't seen anything new from you; most of everything appears like you're just agreeing with people. I might be wrong though.
V: I've noticed V isn't afraid to post anything. I think that's a good thing, it shows that he's not afraid to speak his mind even if his thoughts aren't (originally) supported by the majority. Also, there's the fact that he started this small wagon on Storn, so if Storn gets lynched tonight and flips red, then that'll put V in my green pile. Also, he made that inspirational sounding post about seeing every situation as fresh and unique and looking at everything from multiple angles. Although seemingly obvious advice, it could inspire town to "refresh" their look on the game so to speak; and that's not something that typically wolves would want to do.
Storn: I'm sorry, I feel like half the time I don't quite understand exactly what you're trying to say ;~; Like Charu said, your behavior is very "floaty" and that's not behavior that I think is town-indicative. The thing is, wolves have to conjure up false beliefs and then display those beliefs to town. Since those beliefs are made up, it's really easy change, either intentionally or accidentally, what those beliefs are, leading to what appears as indecisive or contradictory behavior or "floaty" behavior (I apologize if I'm interpreting what you meant by this word, Charu).
Some examples. In this post, he expresses that he thinks that he thinks Charu is a wolf. Then he immediately says that I'd be the best vote (even though Charu is pushing a lynch on me), gives no explanation, and then goes back to Charu. It's almost as if you just want to randomly throw names out there so it looks like you have an opinion. In the next next post, he says that he has no reason to believe Charu is a wolf which appears to be at odds with the content of his previous proof and just like before, he sticks with his wagonhopping with no explanation. With this post, I can't even...you can't just go around throwing claims around with nothing to back it up...it seems like a copout to stick to your opinion without having to justify it. Finally, you give some logic, but the logic is very vague in the sense that you're just saying that other people had good arguments, but you never say what those arguments explicitly are. Then this is this post which confuses me to no end...why would you vote for Charu, even as a placeholder, when the last time you posted regarding him, you said that you have no reason to believe he's wolf? Then you explain your voting by trying to use meta on yourself...but like I expressed before in an earlier post...trying to use meta on yourself has little credibility. I have some more points...but I've been writing this for a long time and I want to push something out before the phase actually ends...
Zenith: I feel like Zenith's posts are sometimes awkward from time to time. Part of it perhaps because it seems that he posts a lot of things that already readily obvious or shallow? To be fair though, he is a new player and what might seem as trivial to us likely isn't obvious for a new player. Overall, it seems he's been putting in an honest effort and seems to be interacting well with everyone.
Comment