TWG CLXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

[Syhto]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

Oh. Prec. I like him too right now.

As for WV I see the reason for MML vote was something weird and I didn't like that answer.

I'd be fine with voting for WV, MML or DBP currently.

Haku is null to me because he hasn't posted much and I remember him being a little flighty last game I was in with him.. Hard to tell so far.

[inDheart]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

whatever

whomst

[Syhto]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

syhto, the dumbtell thing is like,
-wolves have the power where they can guess a number to sabotage town roles
-knowing this, mml would know that asking town to say whether they would take a power gives wolves the info they need to guess that number fairly accurately
-therefore, he'd already know that's a bad idea and not to suggest it
-but he appears to not know it. so could he put that thought out there as a wolf still, or does not reading just make him town?

i don't think it's definitive, so if you already understood that and are just saying the same thing, ignore this

Ah, I get it now. Okay, yeah, I don't buy that as a dumbtell in the slightest.

[the sun fan]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

whomst

my heart is not in it because my head is not in it or the other way around, idk which

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

Oh. Prec. I like him too right now.

As for WV I see the reason for MML vote was something weird and I didn't like that answer.

I'd be fine with voting for WV, MML or DBP currently.

Haku is null to me because he hasn't posted much and I remember him being a little flighty last game I was in with him.. Hard to tell so far.

How is a set up for a joke that never happened weird like tf

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

"I didn't see roundbox's post before. Now that I've read it"--and note that roundbox's post alludes to the possibility of the wolf sabotage--"it's best to keep quiet on those discussions."

He ninja'd me while I was phone posting man but fucking sure

Excuse my candidness, if anything is fucking stupid, it is this "shitposting phase" that is so clung to here. What is the point of even having a d0 when all y'all seem to do is complain about not having anything to go on the whole time, and then give me crap for voicing my opinion to get something going?

Please be aware, that was not a "serious" vote for mml. That was a vote to try and, yes, get the ball rolling and get a feel for the players here. I really don't care if you think the reasoning was unsound, as it was not an actual accusation. It was a move based on feeling, that I attempted to back up a little bit with words. Although it is mostly just feeling. And obvious, that this early on I can change my mind easily based on the reactions that occur.

I don't believe that for solid second.

As far as Anti-Pearl is concerned, I don't think activity is necessarily a huge indicator of alignment by itself, but it's a player's actions that lets them be evaluated. If Pearl posts just enough to avoid replacement, they remain a cypher that continues on into the later game, with no evidence to make a case for or against them. It also raises a mechanical concern: if town, can they be counted on to vote? If scum, will they throw in a fatal vote when we're least expecting it?

With most players, total inactivity to this point would be concerning, but possibly coincidental. Pearl has a history of this now.

The thing is, that still doesn't necessarily mean they're the best choice of lynch. I feel like lynching the "most likely wolf" is a better option than a useless cypher--and FG's point about interactions is valid. Plus, assuming Pearl is truly inactive, zero posts today should allow for a replacement.

But I'd be kind of okay with a Pearl lynch, albeit for slightly different reasons than Charu's essentially policy stance. Pearl may not be the best lynch, but they're probably the least worst lynch--right now, we have no expectation of contribution, and without flips they become even more dangerous as the game progresses.

So do you like, need the thread to determine what it wants before you take a stance or what?

I
WV is a whatever, don't have anything important to discuss. Vote on MML is pretty lame since it came after a vote from MML. Nothing to make of it besides, I guess, why the vote? That about it.

I never voted?
Like what the actual hell?

...And that's why you're voting me?

Time reads on d0 seem about right th

Mml vote was a dumb vote and it was suppose to be the start of a joke that ended up not happening

Where you planning on umvoting or you gonna leave it on me w/e having to answer for it?

[Syhto]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

FG. I disagree with your reasoning for voting for Charu. He was requested more opinions and he gave them. I don't know about meta but that does not seem strange or some unheard of amount of effort to put into d0 for anybody. And yea. You are unconfident and indecisive and you are right. You have been that way in every game I have seen with you. It is making me kinda doubt you, because I feel I can never get a good read in for you.

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

syhto, the dumbtell thing is like,
-wolves have the power where they can guess a number to sabotage town roles
-knowing this, mml would know that asking town to say whether they would take a power gives wolves the info they need to guess that number fairly accurately
-therefore, he'd already know that's a bad idea and not to suggest it
-but he appears to not know it. so could he put that thought out there as a wolf still, or does not reading just make him town?

i don't think it's definitive, so if you already understood that and are just saying the same thing, ignore this

So my dumbtell is me not knowing something

So the opposite of a wolf dumbtell

Oh ok yeah better vote Lar then too logical to not

[Charu]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

I never voted?
Like what the actual hell?

I phrased that wrong. It's supposed to be in regards that a vote was already on you when he made that vote, not that you made a vote yourself to wayward.

[roundbox]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

here are the following people that are ok with lynching anti-pearl:
charu
ind
haku
dabackpack (mentioned)
precarious ("kind of ok")

Everyone with that "let the host replace them" shit:

GAME TOOK FOREVER TO FILL THERE ARE LIKELY NO REPLACEMENTS READY YET THIS IS SUCH A BAD POINT TO ANGLE SHOOT WITH

lar said this which is ???
this is probably getting too far into angleshooting territory, maybe not

regardless, the point of this post is to call out these 5 people and give me something objective as to why we should bank on an inactive than someone with a non-zero of interactions

[the sun fan]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

is eod in 5?
or is it in a bit over an hour?

[Charu]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

mmmmmmmmmwayward vagabond

Actually nevermind, I read that as MML for whatever reason, I'm just retarded.

Still, my read stands on Wayward for him doing something after that vote on him I guess.

[Charu]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

is eod in 5?
or is it in a bit over an hour?

It's actually 1AM EST

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

I phrased that wrong. It's supposed to be in regards that a vote was already on you when he made that vote, not that you made a vote yourself to wayward.

Gotcha, but I think that fact makes his vote look worse

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWGXXXI - TWGreeD - Game Thread

lar said this which is ???
this is probably getting too far into angleshooting territory, maybe not

I'm sorry but how is that too much of an angle shoot when people where defending him and inactivity with "but host would have replaced him!"

Double standard much?