TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

[Red Blaster]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

You and your fuckboy wolf partner Xiz

actually reading that back, I owe an apology to Vince

[XelNya]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

Don't really like DBP's posts about TPS who keep in mind had one post (the post about mechanics in D0)

Lock town after one post that I completely destroyed him for being 100% a wolf based off of meta..ok.









Let's go with that last one.

His storn posts are kinda interesting to read in hindsight

His early game Drizzle posts make almost zero sense

This train of thought honestly doesn't even line up with itself.

His posts about MarioNintendo are really something else

This is as far as I had time to get, I'll do more later when I get home from work.

ayyyyyyyy

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

Third target--> Mellonxcollie
Bet you didn't expect that one. Now this is a bit of a stretch, since I can't prove it, but TPS222 made a post after his replacement for mellon where he pretty much said that he had trouble during this game because out-of-thread talk was not allowed. His post also ended with a ":/" face, in case that helps anyone remember. Was I the only one to see that? Nobody else quoted it, and during that period I was in hiding (my last post before this one was #1211, and his was around ~#1300). There's no reason for him to post something like that if he's not a wolf, since they're the only role who can potentially talk out of threads. I don't know if he deleted it himself after realizing how huge that slip was, but it's not there anymore. He had no right to post that since he was already replaced, but hey, I saw it, and you bet I won't let it slip that easily. Mellon's posting has been great so far, and if she's truly a wolf, I would have been 100% fooled. However, since she inherited TPS's role, she also inherits his mistakes, and so this creates a huuuuuuuge doubt in my mind at this point. I literally feel bad for mellon at this point, but as I've said, I think TPS's post was in fact a gigantic slip that he deleted himself upon realization, and this has to be discussed at the very least

I want to make sure this avenue gets fully explored.

Please, allow me.

This logic is extremely flawed. First of all, TPS is not playing this game anymore. I'm not sure that you can be so certain someone is "slipping" when they are not even playing anymore. Secondly, TPS is an old school TWG player. Back in the day, most games were played with "out of thread" talking allowed between all players at ALL TIMES. When you signed up for TWG you also posted your AIM handle so that people could reach you on messenger. Private conversations between people could happen this way. This made for some really crazy and fun games where people photoshopped conversations, faked AIM logs, etc etc.

It's a very different dynamic to the game and I understand why many people don't like to play that way. But it can be easier for people who are busy because they are able to contact people through text/messenger and they can focus on their individual conversations without needing to get caught up in the thread.

This is really a non-slip made by someone who wasn't even me. I'd really re-examine your case there.

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

After catching up on the thread, I think lurker really is the take down.

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

I got an idea
To prove botchi and drizz's innocence
lets vote lurker
and force botchi or drizz be the insta to prove their innocence

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

Am I wrong with how that role works?

If we lynch the takedown, and a mafia is the last person to vote the takedown, they also die right?

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

So if they refuse, or randomly go afk and leave the thread for the rest of the phase, we know something is up.
In my opinion, we should stack on a target EARLY, so we have room to analyze instead of rushing it at EOD.

We don't have to lynch lurker first, it can be botchi or drg or whoever idk.

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

That seems like a decent plan. Either way I think we should be trying to lynch the take down and get that effect out of the way

I also think it's a good idea to plan ahead. It does give the wolves room to influence the plan but it also gives them more chances to slip up.

[Makilaz]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

Am I wrong with how that role works?

If we lynch the takedown, and a mafia is the last person to vote the takedown, they also die right?

it says the last person to vote would die alongside them, so this should work

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

Can we agree now then who we should vote?
Right now I know DBP and I are on DRG.

Do we all want to swap to luker?

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

Do we all want to swap to luker?

I'm down with it. If he is town, he is playing very poorly by being so all over the place. But I think that he's begging us to lynch him because he is the take down

[botchi246]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

I will be the final vote on either one. Although id like to lynch drg more than lurker despite his meltdown. drg

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

Cool i'll start

lurker

[Tokzic]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

I will be the final vote on either one. Although id like to lynch drg more than lurker despite his meltdown. drg

but botchi that's voting first i am confused

[Tokzic]

Re: TWG CLIII - Cha Cha Got 'Em! - Game Thread

i have no fucking clue how to interpret lurker's red claim, red claims are awful 99% of the time unless you have some obscure role that benefits greatly

Even if Lurker is the take down, which does "benefit" from being lynched, I don't feel like the benefits here outweigh reds losing their second member in this situation. Fucking weird move.