TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

I flop a lot, but Stunfisk doesn't seem like flopping is its game.
Yoshl, for the sole purpose of annoying you

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Also how 'bout this:

Daytime seer chooses odd numbers (RSD, Xiz, Halogen)
Nighttime seer chooses even numbers (Tokzic, T-force, riotpolice)
(*In regards to player #) like I am #7


I'm cool with leaving it up to the seer's to decide who they WANT to seer, as long as there is NO OVERLAPPING SEERS. I can compromise there.

Also I'm cool with a Xiz seer also. Start somewhere.

[YoshL]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Xiz, i'm still waiting for you to fully explain your logic.

"There is no red miller. That's huge, especially for seers.
Therefor, there is no need for a 'confirmation' seering."

like, wtf?

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Xiz, i'm still waiting for you to fully explain your logic.

"There is no red miller. That's huge, especially for seers.
Therefor, there is no need for a 'confirmation' seering."

like, wtf?

Are you really fucking serious?


The lack of a red miller means that if a seer gets a red seering, they are 100% red. No questions asked.

A confirmation seering is what I called two people seering the same person. Which is nothing more then a complete waste of time.

[YoshL]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

once a-fucking-gain

and if a seer gets wolfed before revealing?

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Welp, then that sucks for us.

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Hello! I have finally caught up with the thread and have no more obligations so I can actually keep up with it now hooray~

Xiz, I get what you're saying and I agree with you that it would be more efficient to have no double-seers. However I really don't see a system working without outing at least one of the seers. Your number system seems like a decent one, however it has a few loopholes.

We will want to be seering specific players depending on how they are playing and what sort of posts they are making no matter what their number ranking is. For example if the people who are suspicious are both ranked as even numbers, we will want to seer both of those players, but under your system only one of those players would be seered. If they are both really suspicious and the daytime seer decides to just seer one of them anyway, they are just using their best judgement and your system is just useless. In the end of that scenario the seer just does whatever they think is best anyway, so why even implement this system at all?

Basically I could see it happening that good seering opportunities are wasted in the name of "not wasting seering opportunities".

[YoshL]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Welp, then that sucks for us.

all i was looking for was some acknowledgement that you've been actually reading posts rather than skimming over them and being "he's arguing with me! must call stupid"

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Xiz, I get what you're saying and I agree with you that it would be more efficient to have no double-seers. However I really don't see a system working without outing at least one of the seers. Your number system seems like a decent one, however it has a few loopholes.

We will want to be seering specific players depending on how they are playing and what sort of posts they are making no matter what their number ranking is. For example if the people who are suspicious are both ranked as even numbers, we will want to seer both of those players, but under your system only one of those players would be seered. If they are both really suspicious and the daytime seer decides to just seer one of them anyway, they are just using their best judgement and your system is just useless. In the end of that scenario the seer just does whatever they think is best anyway, so why even implement this system at all?

I could def see both of the seer's being like "Wow, Halogen is being sketchy as fuck. But I bet the other seer with seer him, so I'mma go for Thesunfan instead who is still on my priority list"

I mean, yeah you are right. My plan has flaws. But it's better then no plan.
If anyone else has anything better, i'm still all ears.

all i was looking for was some acknowledgement that you've been actually reading posts rather than skimming over them and being "he's arguing with me! must call stupid"

O lmfao why didn't you just say so. I was wondering why you were posting such really bizarre posts.

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

while Xiz's "you seer the evens, you seer the odds" is an interesting idea, I don't agree that it would work. Mellin is right in that we should seer who we see most fit, but there has to be some way that we don't end up wasting them. I don't think we should give up on the idea this easily.
and TC Halogen

[jwcgator]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Leaving that aside, I don't really think Xiz is a wolf, but therefore, I submit a seering vote for Xiz.

Technically, seering someone you think isn't a wolf would be a huge waste of time in comparison to seering someone who you think is a wolf. Don't suggest things that are counter intuitive.

That being said, I submit a seering vote for whoever the seers want to seer

[jwcgator]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

And if the wolves got a seer... well that sucks, but the "The Enforcer and Aide will recognize you if you are killed. " or "The Inspector and Aide will recognize you if you are killed."

I'm assuming that means the citizen with the vest will know that one of them died.

[Riotpolice]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

Also, I'd like to throw in my own seer vote: Yoshl

[YoshL]

Re: TWG CIII: New Players Welcome

welcome to discussion riotpolice

pick a better seering candidate if at all voting

people who play by not posting anything are more dangerous, because there's less info that they're giving out

it sucks to be in end game and have people with like 2 posts in the whole thread and have to determine whether they're a wolf or not