'Ight, I'm changing my vote to Vendetta21. It seems a bit suspicious to question people and get them to vote. I don't think he's even proved his own innocence.
unless he did and I'm missing something o3o
Originally posted by MixMasterLar
is funny eaman?
Can you like not use those stupid names right now? Took me long enough to get these screen names straight in my head
Don't trust me again? Man, this feels like the third game in a row, except this time you're going at it day 1.
And what do you mean by keeping your vote? YOU NEVER PLACED ONE ON ME UNTIL NOW!
Well fine, two can play it that game, Mr. Cubone.
I'm placing my vote on Mr. X-
Nah, just kidding.
But for now, I think my vote will go to James May. I'm not digging the posting style he's going for and I feel it's going to make him suspicious and be used as a scapegoat later if he truly is a player.
Would a sandbagger do this intentionally though? Possibly, if he was a sandbagger, this facade he's doing might be used in hopes that he go under the radar but still look active. It feels like that's what he's trying to establish here.
Originally posted by JohnRedWolf87
Charu the red-nosed Snivy
Had a very shiny nose
And if you ever saw it
You could even say it glows
All of the other Snivies
Used to laugh and call him names
They never let poor Charu
Join in any Snivy games
(Click the arrow to see the rest)
Originally posted by Vendetta21
All in all I would say that Charu not only won this game, his play made me reconsider how I play it.
James May for being redundant and using the word "plebian".
/humor
Originally posted by Funnygurl555
I picked randomly. I don't really know who to vote for this time 'cause we have nothing to go off of...
It's either that or I'd vote for a no-lynch, but apparently that looks really suspicious.
There's no point in voting for a no-lynch this early, because there's still more time to try to make something happen. And not voting for one just because it would be suspicious to do so ... There are wolf-benefiting reasons why it would be suspicious, and it's for those reasons that you shouldn't be voting for one. If you honestly believe a no-lynch is a good idea, you should have your reasons, and that shouldn't stop you from voting for one.
Originally posted by Funnygurl555
'Ight, I'm changing my vote to Vendetta21. It seems a bit suspicious to question people and get them to vote. I don't think he's even proved his own innocence.
unless he did and I'm missing something o3o
This isn't suspicious. Maybe here's the point you missed:
Originally posted by Vendetta21
you create the things we have to go off to win.
Funnygurl555
P.S. Welp, I'm glad I was able to check the forum and sign-up during my lunch break on Saturday!
Don't trust me again? Man, this feels like the third game in a row, except this time you're going at it day 1.
And what do you mean by keeping your vote? YOU NEVER PLACED ONE ON ME UNTIL NOW!
Well fine, two can play it that game, Mr. Cubone.
I'm placing my vote on Mr. X-
Nah, just kidding.
But for now, I think my vote will go to James May. I'm not digging the posting style he's going for and I feel it's going to make him suspicious and be used as a scapegoat later if he truly is a player.
Would a sandbagger do this intentionally though? Possibly, if he was a sandbagger, this facade he's doing might be used in hopes that he go under the radar but still look active. It feels like that's what he's trying to establish here.
Now we're talking. See Charu, if you're going to use meta on me, the best you could do is look at my past games. All of my day 1 plays are like this and I was town (with the exception of Kevin's game but he told me that was intentional oops). ANYHOW, I like the fact that you're going with your gut in thinking who you suspect the most, and that I respect you. But looking forward on this present issue, I could point out a few minor fallacies if I had access to a computer that you have presented forth on this.
@Pete(dance): Now, for the essence of me "stating" my humanity so early, it's really not the point of stating, but to question one's reasoning of thinking that I'm on a different alignment.
@funnygurl: it's no big deal, I was a derp when I first played as well.
@greg(sunfan): back on the topic of wanting to hear more from me, the reason why I don't "talk" in that motion o your vote because I feel like in order to make someone talk, you need substance in your votes. A vote is just a plain outlier in the realm of reasoning if you don't have something to hold it together. It's like an accusation per se. In order to accuse someone, you need evidence, which is why I never take a vote without any reasoning seriously.
Ok, I'll give you some "substance."
After Charu came with a few things against you already, you just kinda brushed it off like it was nothing, and I want to hear what you have to say regarding this.
So what if you're playing D1 like you have been when you're town? That doesn't mean shit. People can play to whatever meta they wish. And yeah, I look forward to you pointing out the "minor fallacies" of both my and Charu's arguments.
Originally posted by Vendetta21
Did you get a chance to kill that deadbeat sonuvabitch boyfriend of danceguys', "sunfan"? i hate that fucker. he's a stupid head. i'm way smarter and funnier and prettier and richer and more sensitive than him, and like i can get drunk and still hold complex logical conversations n shit and i bet that fucker cant.
Originally posted by XelNya
I'd suck a dick in a dark, dark alley.
Originally posted by star-crossed
(Someone helpfully lectured us in postgame that we voted out the wrong inactive player with COVID on Day 1.)
Ok, I'll give you some "substance."
After Charu came with a few things against you already, you just kinda brushed it off like it was nothing, and I want to hear what you have to say regarding this.
So what if you're playing D1 like you have been when you're town? That doesn't mean shit. People can play to whatever meta they wish. And yeah, I look forward to you pointing out the "minor fallacies" of both my and Charu's arguments.
Yours? You just merely copypasta'd Charu's silly xd
And I will, to satisfy your pleasures~
No but seriously, what Charu is doing is using meta (which albeit is a useless thing to use when determining who to vote for) and if you are coinciding your vote with Charu's reasoning, then you are saying that you trust in what Charu is saying even if the game is a deterrent of trust.
Comment