TWG XCIV: Old Blood

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Voting isn't the same as viging.

you just ignored like about 3 of my posts if you just said this

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Freaky is still on my villager list his contributions have all been pro village. I like ur strategy in case of a vig, pooling the thoughts of everyone's suspicions acts as a double village kill. Anyways tps is being very utr, viewing the thread often and posting little. Zoshi wagon feels fine to me right now as well.

[One Winged Angel]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Freaky if we create a separate voting pool for the vigi to night kill, if we elect a human to be vigi’d, and if SK exists and vigi doesn’t, couldn’t SK kill any other human at night banking on us to now lynch the human we’d suspect as SK?

It's a viable plan assuming co-operation from the SK masking vigi until we hit him. But that isn't guaranteed.

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

That's why you'd just do it for this phase. If the voted person isn't killed then either there is no vig (likely) or wolves got a role blocker and luckily guessed the vig. It really is not a -EV strategy and doesn't benefit the potential SK much if at all

[One Winged Angel]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Okay as long as the plan wasn't to jump on the person that wasn't vigi'd regardless

[James May]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Voting isn't the same as viging. After a vigi we still need to lynch. I'm viewing worst case scenario as being down three humans by the start of the next day phase.

Freaky if we create a separate voting pool for the vigi to night kill, if we elect a human to be vigi’d, and if SK exists and vigi doesn’t, couldn’t SK kill any other human at night banking on us to now lynch the human we’d suspect as SK?

It's a viable plan assuming co-operation from the SK masking vigi until we hit him. But that isn't guaranteed.

That's what I was thinking.

That's why you'd just do it for this phase. If the voted person isn't killed then either there is no vig (likely) or wolves got a role blocker and luckily guessed the vig. It really is not a -EV strategy and doesn't benefit the potential SK much if at all

But going onto this point, sure it would be a safe option but the odds of all this weighs heavily on having the possibility of no SK & no vigi since the roles are heavily randomized (hence the 50% chance of SK popping up in the roles). But, if anything, since we know that Rob is a 1-shot seer, and from what I'm guessing that role can only allow him to use seering powers only once throughout the game, that whoever s the full seer in the game should seer Zoshi on Night 2 and both the 1-shot and full roleblockers should roleblock 2 potential wolves/SK on that same phase. That is what I'm suggesting at least.

Until then, keeping my vote on freakysnots until I know for sure that tps or zoshi are either wolves or Serial Killer.

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Please go read the rules and try that post again

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Freaky if we create a separate voting pool for the vigi to night kill, if we elect a human to be vigi’d, and if SK exists and vigi doesn’t, couldn’t SK kill any other human at night banking on us to now lynch the human we’d suspect as SK?

It's a viable plan assuming co-operation from the SK masking vigi until we hit him. But that isn't guaranteed.

As long as he masks, we can assume that the kills are being done by a vigi or a SK. If he doesn't mask, which is what I'm hoping for, we can immediately know that there is a SK in the game. This can be accomplished if everyone agrees on one target to vigi.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Reading james' posts makes my brain hurt.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Until then, keeping my vote on freakysnots until I know for sure that tps or zoshi are either wolves or Serial Killer.

so instead you keep your vote on one of the only people in the thread that is human. good plan

[One Winged Angel]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Okay I think it's beneficial to have a vigi pool at this point, although I think it's more likely SK doesn't exist in this game, it doesn't hurt us at all trying to confirm.

I don't like how often I see Tps lurking the thread and not saying anything. First phase he voted me and justified it with a quick line. Now he's saying nothing despite reading everything. Just want us to take each other out maybe?

[One Winged Angel]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

aaaaaaaaand he's gone again

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

Lynching someone we all agree on is +EV.

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

actually no. we can't relate twg to poker. stop doing that

[FoJaR]

Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood

VOTECOUNT

freaky (4): V, viccica, zoshi, james
zoshi (3): OWA, freaky, manti
TPS (1): jrodd

3 votes from lynch

yet to vote: TPS, Gun, meno, syhto