That's a serious question. I don't want answers from V or freaky.
Shhh, I want to hear from the other 5 players viewing the thread. There's a very good case for one side of the argument, and a very easily abused case for the other.
AAA's = 800
Originally posted by V
Manti, I apologize for insulting you. Let the record show that I am a prickass douche, and not only that, but that I am a terrible player.
This is not you man. Albeit if you were a green then you wouldn't be like this, regardless on how the game goes by. And I truly feel like you are using a last resort in case if things weren't going to go your way. Why would we want to vigi TPS? I understand the reasoning behind lynching Zoshi but until I know why do you want to have the vigi (1-shot or not, not sure if we have either of them or both of them since none of them came forward at this point).
Freaky is not a wolf, and I'm dissapointed by everyone who is seriously voting for him.
Do you remember this post?
Originally posted by DarkManticoreX2
*if.
Is cardflipping on? First post doesn't say yes or no.
I don't just ask questions I know the answer to for no reason, I wanted responses, particularly from freaky. He responded:
Originally posted by freakysnots
Yes it is. It says so on the third and fourth post.
Freaky knew cardflipping was on, so it makes no sense for him to defend another wolf in the thread. It makes even less sense for him to do it as a wolf while Kraut's life was uncertain. If that wolf dies, Freaky is automatically tied to him and he is likely to be lynched the next day.
In that situation a wolf wouldn't go into the public eye and make a stink about it, A wolf would wait to see the verdict, or be pissed at Kraut for not reading the rules.
AAA's = 800
Originally posted by V
Manti, I apologize for insulting you. Let the record show that I am a prickass douche, and not only that, but that I am a terrible player.
Comment