RE: Re: RE: TWG VI - Night 1
I'm sorry, I haven't been clear enough about my reasons.
The first post of TPS
Posted: Dec 08, 2004 - 02:36 PM
then I posted two arguments against tps, then
Last edited by Tps222 on Dec 09, 2004 - 08:46 AM; edited 1 time in total
Never mentioned why he edited, but true, it'll be hard to pinpoint what you said to put the blame on you when you've edited out all the mistakes that gave you away in your post
Second post by Tps.
Posted: Dec 09, 2004 - 06:36 AM
Two hours later, again without mentioning why
Last edited by Tps222 on Dec 09, 2004 - 08:48 AM; edited 1 time in total
You seem to be in the habit of changing the content of your posts alot to try to fit in with what people before AND after you say.
I didn't even bother talking about the content of these posts, because I've already pointed out all the flaws in them in my previous statements about tass...
Third post was just about how he liked my chart, no harm there.
4th post, "87x is being too quiet" and too a phantom vote, so he gets voted
5th post, says he's less suspicious, but tells us to "keep an eye open" for 87x for taking a phantom vote, and Kefit, for "being quiet lately". Strong enough arguments.
6th post, he's sorry for being absent for events he had no control over. Blah is working with me and we're trying to lynch the strongest player. Tass said we're wolves, but blah has said less than me about his reasons, so he votes blah. Again, can't argue with that logic.
7th post, getting more reasonable. He's sorry for being busy with events he had no control over. He want's to know what he's said that's so suspicious. He's explained himself very well, unlike otehr people (no names). I haven't shown any decent evidence agains him (see 6 of my 27 posts). This makes me look like a wolf. He's starting to get extremely suspicious of me and blah, who obviously look like we're working together.
I could put more redundant comments here, but aside from the evidence up there ^ my other posts are enough reasoning by my standards for my beleif.
I'm sorry, I haven't been clear enough about my reasons.
The first post of TPS
Posted: Dec 08, 2004 - 02:36 PM
then I posted two arguments against tps, then
Last edited by Tps222 on Dec 09, 2004 - 08:46 AM; edited 1 time in total
Never mentioned why he edited, but true, it'll be hard to pinpoint what you said to put the blame on you when you've edited out all the mistakes that gave you away in your post
Second post by Tps.
Posted: Dec 09, 2004 - 06:36 AM
Two hours later, again without mentioning why
Last edited by Tps222 on Dec 09, 2004 - 08:48 AM; edited 1 time in total
You seem to be in the habit of changing the content of your posts alot to try to fit in with what people before AND after you say.
I didn't even bother talking about the content of these posts, because I've already pointed out all the flaws in them in my previous statements about tass...
Third post was just about how he liked my chart, no harm there.
4th post, "87x is being too quiet" and too a phantom vote, so he gets voted
5th post, says he's less suspicious, but tells us to "keep an eye open" for 87x for taking a phantom vote, and Kefit, for "being quiet lately". Strong enough arguments.
6th post, he's sorry for being absent for events he had no control over. Blah is working with me and we're trying to lynch the strongest player. Tass said we're wolves, but blah has said less than me about his reasons, so he votes blah. Again, can't argue with that logic.
7th post, getting more reasonable. He's sorry for being busy with events he had no control over. He want's to know what he's said that's so suspicious. He's explained himself very well, unlike otehr people (no names). I haven't shown any decent evidence agains him (see 6 of my 27 posts). This makes me look like a wolf. He's starting to get extremely suspicious of me and blah, who obviously look like we're working together.
I could put more redundant comments here, but aside from the evidence up there ^ my other posts are enough reasoning by my standards for my beleif.



Comment