TWG XXXVI

[FishFishRevolution]

Re: TWG XXXVI

ps i bet tass wants WOLVES to vote for wilkin to try and TRAP them into bandwagoning so he can find out who's really stretching for a vote. I just wanted everyone to know that I understand this as i vote for wilkin who was not even in my suspicion list earlier today.

Let's face it; I have no idea who to vote for. I'm not ready to make the choice between iggy and talisman (although I'm leaning iggy right now, i want to talk to him on aim one more time before I decide), and talisman did me the favor of showing me how bad my other choices for suspicions were (which were based off momentary thoughts on a break between classes while reading every third word in posts scattered throughout the thread--my bad). ALL THAT BEING SAID I would feel most comfortable voting for either TPS or WILKIN right now, and since Mr Never Lost A Game While Leading An Alliance Before voted Wilkin, I think it's a safe bet to follow it up.

ps talisman's old avatar

[FishFishRevolution]

Re: TWG XXXVI

fish I want to talk to you but you aren't online.

Fine i'm getting online, but I have less than 5 mintues to get to sleep, I dont' want to be totally sleep deprived tomorrow.

[FishFishRevolution]

Re: TWG XXXVI

11:22:14 PM insanelikeafish: you summoned me, master?
11:22:30 PM insanelikeafish: from the forum: "Fine i'm getting online, but I have less than 5 mintues to get to sleep, I dont' want to be totally sleep deprived tomorrow."
11:22:37 PM insanelikeafish: talk at me
11:23:49 PM insanelikeafish: wtf
11:23:51 PM insanelikeafish: are you even on
11:23:56 PM insanelikeafish: is my connection unstable?
11:24:02 PM insanelikeafish: SAY SOMEHTING

I'm sorry, i have to get to sleep ;( I tried.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

ps my aim won't let me open a window with you. I think it's on my end... something's fubar'd.

if you only have five minutes that's not enough anyway.

[FishFishRevolution]

Re: TWG XXXVI

sorry <3

[Wilkin]

Re: TWG XXXVI

I'd really appreciate it if I wasn't lynched with this big chunk of evidence from my last post unnoticed.


Tps (1) - DBP
Wilkin (3) - Tass, Tps, Fish
Iggy (1) - Talis
Matt (2) - sertman, Iggy
ivaluebet (1) - Jurs
Tass (1) - Wilkin

Left to vote (3) - Matt, ivaluebet, Randumb

[Wilkin]

Re: TWG XXXVI

Changing vote to Matt to at least induce a KitB.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

tass wasn't being serious.

[klagett]

Re: TWG XXXVI

wilken i got stuck at work hope i make it. Err this is ivaluebet again sorry. Damn ffr tourny.

[Wilkin]

Re: TWG XXXVI

So then why would he vote me two days in a row with no explanation except for a "non-serious" one? And it's also going to get me lyched at this point, as Fish used that as his reasoning for voting me, putting me one over Matt now.

[ivaluebet]

Re: TWG XXXVI

^^ klagett is me btw. Sorry I did that I got stuck at work an extra 8 freakin hours.

[Wilkin]

Re: TWG XXXVI

Well, what's YOUR resoning for voting me, value? I'm curious because I've only had one half of an actual reason out of four votes, as Tps' vote was also influenced by Tass' post.

[Tps222]

Re: TWG XXXVI

Tps's vote was not influenced by Tass. I already explained my reasoning, the fact that he voted you as well affected it in no way.

Day over?

[sertman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

ad hominem, sert, not ad verbatim

whoops

[Wilkin]

Re: TWG XXXVI

WHOOPS I READ YOUR POST WRONG.

Anyway, it still gave me a vote from Fish:

rofl, tass has lost it, but you can't argue with a "seering"

ALL THAT BEING SAID I would feel most comfortable voting for either TPS or WILKIN right now, and since Mr Never Lost A Game While Leading An Alliance Before voted Wilkin, I think it's a safe bet to follow it up.

1) He posted his vote right after my post on the lack of a seer, but I guess he just didn't see mine. Thus, I IM'd him saying to check post #315, but I got no response. I know he was there, though, as he was still posting and trying to contact Talis on AIM. Besides, sertman already posted about how there was no human seer, and no reaction from Fish either.

2) Has anyone thought of how odd this is for Tass? He votes me one day for no apparent reason, and then the next day, apparently not being serious about his reasoning. Am I the only one who thinks this is pretty odd, especially since his not-serious post in going to get me lynched? With Tass' BS vote on me, I'm changing my mind and saying that Mead was really the ZH, and Tass' little plan worked beautifully. And throw in Fish as the TS or something. It's a long shot, but I can't think of anything else that would make Tass do this.