TWG XXXVI

[sertman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

meh... placeholder on matt until later tonight

[Tps222]

Re: TWG XXXVI

If he is up before 6 AM he'll make it.

That's if England is 6 hours ahead and not 5.

[iggymatrixcounter]

Re: TWG XXXVI

Dunno, Shash wasn't a major player so that kill seems stupid... inexperienced wolves, maybe?

going right back to Wilkin. he got seer'd.

Ah I get it.

Trap on jurs and sertman. Thier "confusion" to how the game is setup is supposed to denote innocence.

OR

They are the inexperienced wolves that sertman so arrogantly spook of XD.

Where's random?

My take on tps is that hes just being as crude and irrational to stay alive. I first thought jurs was a wolf for following tps so eagerly on lynching someone (which would say that cypher was human.) BUT she was in the lead for the lynch so I don't think anyone wouldn't have done the same thing if they were on the chopping block. So I dunno, doesn't clear jurs from those actions, but it doesn't hurt her either.

I'm kind of doubting if sertman had something to do with that switch though. I mean tps told me he did it on his own but doesn't mean it didn't happen. (I.E. sertman and tps set up a kill together.) I kind of dismissed this thoery too since for that to happen, jurs would have been the one they saved, in which they wouldn't ALL do something so obvious.

Whatever, I don't know what actions merit wolfiness and what ones don't. I'm just going to assume tps and disco was all smoke and mirrors. Tps and jurs was a save tactic for jurs and tps being tps. sertman's post about inexperienced wolves would probably apply to him so I don't know why he would say that as a wolf because he would add fire to evidence against him. Jurs is acting like she doesn't know what's going on. She did it before as a wolf but I dunno. I don't think she pays attention even if she's a wolf so I don't think there's much there either. I don't know if fish's "seering" joke is a joke the second time he mentioned it or what. Kind of plays it off as one but still puts wilkin in his list and lists the 'seering' as his short reason.

Leaves matt, ivalue, ddr, and wilkin as the "safe route" takers based from the past couple days. I kind of want to go with matt over wilkin since even if I'm wrong, I'll know that I'm getting rid of someone with 1 (possibly 2) phantoms. There are an even amount of players during day so one phantom is a little more weightier than if there was an odd number.

[sertman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

Heres the reason I switched votes.

1.) Talisman was leading the votes at that point. I don't think he's a wolf, and they were about to lynch him on very little evidence
2.) TPS said that if someone voted Cypher then he'd switch back.
3.) Therefore, because I want Talisman alive because I believe he's human, I switched to Cypher, because he came off less human than Talis does. That took at least one vote off of cypher (TPS) and in Jurs' desperate quest to stay alive, she switched too. It was totally on my own.

[JurseyRider734]

Re: TWG XXXVI

ivalue

So inactive it hurts. Also, I dont want to bandwagon and I have NO idea who to vote. I'm so confused on who I think is wolf and who I think is human.

[sertman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

That's a pretty stark contrast from previous games where you've been pretty opinionated about who's human and who isn't.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

for the record, it's convos like these that make me think jurs is human:

im jurs (9:25:14 PM): flypie's still alive right
stressreliefball (9:25:26 PM): uh

Auto response from im jurs (9:25:26 PM): indeed.

stressreliefball (9:25:33 PM): I think she was killed actually
im jurs (9:25:39 PM): really
stressreliefball (9:25:43 PM): maybe I'm wrong let me check
stressreliefball (9:26:54 PM): yeah she's not in the player list anymore
im jurs (9:27:07 PM): Gotcha

[sertman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

Oh, so it's stupidity, not wolfishness.

[JurseyRider734]

Re: TWG XXXVI

sertman you've played like 2 games with me. Get over yourself.

[sertman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

I've also read over numerous games that included you and I don't ever remember you being so clueless.

[sertman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

Also, good job ignoring the content of my posts and instead responding with ad verbatim attacks. you're cool.

[FishFishRevolution]

Re: TWG XXXVI

Theres no human seer, Fish. Theres the wolf seer and tainted seer, but they're both on the wolves team.

Yeah, hence all the question marks.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

ad hominem, sert, not ad verbatim

[talisman]

Re: TWG XXXVI

fish I want to talk to you but you aren't online.

[Wilkin]

Re: TWG XXXVI

This is cute:

going right back to Wilkin. he got seer'd.

2 wolves, 1 wolf seer, 1 zombie wolf, 1 tainted seer, 1 bookie, one illuminati trio, 1 zombie human, 2 blue millers, 1 red miller, 9 humans, a total of 22 people.

THERE IS NO SEER.

Tass.