Re: TWG CLVI: The Grand TWGabout - GAME THREAD
2-page blocks, that shouldn't be so bad for post length right?
68 (1341-1360)
@Machi (1348) If you feel the scums are inactive, why post the bit about fake effort through long synopses? It seems contradictory to me.
I don't agree that the scum are all inactive in any case. I think there is at least one active, and he/she is playing well. (gut)
@Xel (1352) I don't think it's that out of ordinary to notice your vote shift for the kitb. He posted the vote at 9:17pm, and 9:23pm you make the shift. You make one post prior and you didn't address his post, which made me believe you were simply catching up.
idk why I'm trying to defend him though I still didn't like it lol
69 (1361-1380)
@MML (1364) By deflection you mean from myself? I don't think anyone ever tries to dig their own hole for themselves in this game. Of course I'm going to consider other people. Kind of a derpy post in general.
@Xiz (1369) What exactly about that post made you not vote him? I don't really understand your reasoning there. That kind of reaction was what made me vote for him.
@inDheart (1375) The most basic assumption is to say SK on AA and wolves on Arnt I think. Arnt doesn't really require any lengthy analysis I think.. Even though he garnered some votes, he was not among the top suspects. There's almost no chance wolves kill AA as the 2nd prime suspect.
So the real question is, why would SK kill him? My thought process was that an SK should also try to gun down more-towny folks because as long as suspicion was being raised on the wagons and he wasn't among them, it would be okay.
So my thinking instead now, is that SK kills AA because towards EoD he leaned strongly toward AA as being town and suspected he would no longer be a top suspect going into d2. I don't think wolves would apply this logic because my guess is they would try to keep their suspicions raised of him and poke holes in his posts.
#notepadforposts
2-page blocks, that shouldn't be so bad for post length right?
68 (1341-1360)
@Machi (1348) If you feel the scums are inactive, why post the bit about fake effort through long synopses? It seems contradictory to me.
I don't agree that the scum are all inactive in any case. I think there is at least one active, and he/she is playing well. (gut)
@Xel (1352) I don't think it's that out of ordinary to notice your vote shift for the kitb. He posted the vote at 9:17pm, and 9:23pm you make the shift. You make one post prior and you didn't address his post, which made me believe you were simply catching up.
idk why I'm trying to defend him though I still didn't like it lol
69 (1361-1380)
@MML (1364) By deflection you mean from myself? I don't think anyone ever tries to dig their own hole for themselves in this game. Of course I'm going to consider other people. Kind of a derpy post in general.
@Xiz (1369) What exactly about that post made you not vote him? I don't really understand your reasoning there. That kind of reaction was what made me vote for him.
@inDheart (1375) The most basic assumption is to say SK on AA and wolves on Arnt I think. Arnt doesn't really require any lengthy analysis I think.. Even though he garnered some votes, he was not among the top suspects. There's almost no chance wolves kill AA as the 2nd prime suspect.
So the real question is, why would SK kill him? My thought process was that an SK should also try to gun down more-towny folks because as long as suspicion was being raised on the wagons and he wasn't among them, it would be okay.
So my thinking instead now, is that SK kills AA because towards EoD he leaned strongly toward AA as being town and suspected he would no longer be a top suspect going into d2. I don't think wolves would apply this logic because my guess is they would try to keep their suspicions raised of him and poke holes in his posts.
#notepadforposts














Comment