TWG C: ANONYTWiG

[twg14]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Out of the non existent posters I like 3 the best, the other 2 can easily be wolves

[twg3]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

<3 ilu2 14

[twg6]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Twg12 and twg6 have acted similarly. Both have gone great lengths to impersonate somebody else, they have said little about other players. Of the two I think twg6 tried harder to mask a vote as somewhat serious, and has made more posts to try to look active. I am voting for twg6

The vote I placed was serious, as I explained after you questioned it. If I wanted to make it seem like a joke vote I would have made it way more clear. Also, how can you say that posting more is only "trying" to look active? I'm pretty sure posting with explanations and information (like I have been doing) is equal to showing activity.

It's good to see that we're all starting to work together to try to pinpoint wolves, so I have to give you guys that. However, from 14's rationing it seems that you're all applying pressure to me because to you I seem like the most iffy of the active players. You guys are almost completely forgetting the fact that at least 3 players are basically inactive (10, 3 and 5) which will inevitably become a big issue.

At this point, here are my reads:

twg1:

their first couple of posts were fluff/not adding to the thread, which is pretty much the same across the board. This post is really important though:

oh right i forgot i'm support to just blindly agree with a statement anyone says. tbqh if anyone figures out a name of some suspicious player they consider a wolf, an early guess from a human to kill said suspicious player is a great benefit to the team.

but i do like the idealogy of finding out a random statement from someone else who's unknown, then agreeing with them without explanation, and then quoting it when it's vaguely applicable; this means i either got the guess right and you're tps, or i got the guess wrong and you have an alliance with twg14.



4 was leading onto something, where anyone who got the PM might have accidentally checked out the thread on their normal account (because i did but it was late at night so no one saw). so far i've seen: m0de, yoshL, and Gradiant. yoshL plays TWG regularly so i don't know if that was an accident or just checking out the thread; m0de might have seen the twgX updates to our profiles and came to check it out since he frequests profile chat; and gradiant is a friend of Charu, who's avatar is twg12's. nothing crazy, just throwing that idea out there

1 got some heat for trying to match players to usernames, but they had some good points on being able to tell who's who. This post came off a little bit heated, but I'm inclined to believe 1 is human.

twg2:

2's post have been almost all contentless/fluff posts, save for the few that they attacked 4 in.

okay, I really want 4 dead.

He's having low/non-existent content posts, he isn't getting us anywhere like this. I say the best way that he can help us move forward from here is to insta him, and then use the night kill to really start getting a good look at players.

It seems like they really want 4 dead, mostly because of the "what the fuck" moment 4 had earlier on as well as the no-content posts point. I don't have a great read on 2 but I'm suspicious.

twg3:

Although they were pretty inactive up until today/yesterday, I'm not convinced they're a wolf at this point.

I agree, that whole post was fishy. I don't like your tone TWG9

This is the only vote they've cast so far. There's a little bit of support there, but I initially thought that it's kind of a bandwagon vote. Until, they posted again:

You know who enjoy fish? wolves.


We are bred from a young age to quickly adapt to crowds to succeed, suggesting otherwise shows you attempting to throw a wrench into the ebb and flow. Perhaps you and your bourgeoisie compatriots thrive on being contrary. On top of your MOUNTAIN OF DEAD CORPSES.


No.

It's worded ambiguously but I admire their bluntness. At this point I'm leaning towards a human role for 3, but we'll have to see.


twg4:

tl;dr I don't know. 4 has the most posts of anyone in this thread, which isn't a good indicator of what side they're on. The beginning was a clusterfuck because they were just... crazy. Then again, it could just be something to get everyone to brand them unimportant to the game because of the amount of filler/spam posts being made. After a while they started actively contributing to the thread, which has me leaning towards a human role.

I could take a long time on this read, but I think everyone else has grilled them to bits. I think that since a lot of votes were being piled onto them, they started to straighten up and began to contribute.

twg5:

They've only posted 4 times... basically all of which had no content. I don't know if they're just trying an UTR approach or what, but I'm really iffy. I don't like the fact that they haven't been playing actively, because they could just be passively observing and planning tactics, which is a big red flag.


I don't have time to write out the rest right now, but I will post them later.

[twg6]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Cheers,
Synthlight




(you didn't see that)

[twg11]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

I completely disagree. This game is anonymous for a reason, and half of the fun is how you go about using the theme to your advantage.


Cheers,
Synthlight

For all that I wrote, this feels like a cop out. Sorry Synth, but if other people are going for you, you've still got the most disconcerting feeling about you to me and I'm more comfy with you going in compare to others.

As far as four goes, I find the Mimzy thing irritating but they bring up some pretty solid points and I especially thought posting the rule clarification with the reasoning they did came off as human (though it seems like bad form to keep information about the rules to oneself anyway).

[twg14]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

So we should meet in the middle and lynch 8??

[FictionJunction]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

twg1 - 0 - twg15
twg2 - 3 - twg15, twg1, twg7
twg4 - 3 - twg13, twg8, twg2
twg5 - 1 - twg12
twg6 - 2 - twg9, twg14
twg9 - 1 - twg7, twg3
twg10 - 1 - twg6
twg12 - 0 - twg14
twg13 - 1 - twg4, twg14
twg14 - 1 - twg15

yet to vote: twg5, twg10, twg11

votes for mimzy and synth do not count.

[twg11]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Ahh, dammit man, I thought you weren't gonna say anything. Now I feel like an asshole.

[twg11]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Well AT LEAST IT DIDN'T COUNT but I don't feel so bad that I'm not gonna follow through. I still feel like you're the sketchiest, twg6. Maybe you should ban all dissenters. That's an admin power, isn't it?

[twg14]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

3 way KitB lol, this is good I suppose

[twg3]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Excuuuuuuse you twg6? I am not inactive. I've made several QUALITY POSTS and also idle on AIM. I think y'all wolf mothafuckas might bring attention to my "inactivity" to detract attention away from yourselves.

[twg10]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Safety on twg1.

[twg14]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Safety on twg1.

Omg you have an hour, catch up please

[twg3]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

I also feel that twg6 is sketchy, not sure if I am ready to make a judgement quite yet though


JK twg6 you sketchy wolf you

[twg14]

Re: TWG C: ANONYTWiG

Hey you know who has pressure on them, and is here probably sweating their wolfy balls off staring at the thread afraid to contribute: twg2..................................