Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
oh yeah sorry.
oh yeah sorry.
-
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
fix-edComment
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
I would have rather included Afrobean.Comment
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
he's on the waiting listComment
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
ah fack it
in for replacement
Comment
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
( 4 replacements? ooooooo? )
Originally posted by CharuComment
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
Anko wants to play, Although shes not on the list.It doesnt matter where you draw the line, everything leads to the same place... Over the line!
Best AAA's | Slam the door(61) Scars Left By Time(62) What Lies Beyond The Mountains(62)
Originally posted by emerald000Originally posted by choofComment
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
HEY I DIDN"T GET MY PM
o wai
Does the game need so many potential replacements? Is that common occurrence in games here these days? That'd be awful.
You can take me out of the running for a replacement. I feel like I don't want to play this game as much as other dudes might [and I know fojar doesn't want me to play as much as other dudes]. And anyway, I really don't want to come into the game as one of possibly many replaced.
Comment
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
in the past couple of games, there's has been at least one replacement, so I'd say its fairly commonplace.Comment
-
Re: TWG CV SIGNUPS: Christmas in the Clink
HAY GUYZ SO I JUST FINISHED READING THIS THRAED
Fiction's right. When you're hosting a game, you're essentially constructing a playground for your players. And while "being a dick" should definitely be avoided at all costs, there should be no penalty for playing within the rules. The rules should be define the boundaries for player behaviour. Players should feel like they have complete freedom to do whatever they can to win - within the rules. But you can't put up a playground with a slide and then reprimanding players for using it.
If you can game the system for guaranteed victory, you're not being a dick, you're pointing out a flawed system. We've had failures to launch over this kind of thing before. A good system, when "played" to maximum advantage, should have odds of victory >50%, but nowhere near 100%. If a "too good" solution is played, that's bad design and the game needs retooling. You can't blame your player for trying to win. You can't expect people to go along with, "WELL PLAY LIKE THE 90% SOLUTION DOESN'T EXIST" - that kicks the spirit of competition in the balls.Comment
Comment