TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

[storn42]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

No, I'm confused as to why two people gave V items

I'm inclined to think one was good and one was bad

Bad/bad makes no sense

im willing to make a bet that there is a good for town, good for woof, and good for choof items. (why else would there b a B and C but no A) so it could be bad/bad, good/good or good/bad. or they might even be a neutral effect on the user.

[Curry and Rice]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

Hi, I'm back. I'll be eating dinner in a few minutes. It doesn't seem like too much has been going on since I left, though!

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

More like how many item giving roles do we have if I have one and V has/had two?

That was the point I was trying to make Charu and I don't care if outing an item kills me; still a chance the item is bad anyways.

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

The wolves are coordinating so it doesn't make sense for V to receive two "bad" pills is what I meant

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

im willing to make a bet that there is a good for town, good for woof, and good for choof items. (why else would there b a B and C but no A) so it could be bad/bad, good/good or good/bad. or they might even be a neutral effect on the user.

Bet accepted!

Bet Wager: One of our lives.

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

Oh wait a minutes

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

im willing to make a bet that there is a good for town, good for woof, and good for choof items. (why else would there b a B and C but no A) so it could be bad/bad, good/good or good/bad. or they might even be a neutral effect on the user.

I have A you derp

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

Hey DBP spare a minute since you and I had a conversation about choof

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

Hey DBP spare a minute since you and I had a conversation about choof

??

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

??

Choof cannot be a third party alignment who can convert (like a cultist) as there is an explicit mechanic that disproves the existence of a "Cultist" third party role.

[Vendetta21]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

Lol choof is a wolf

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

Choof cannot be a third party alignment who can convert (like a cultist) as there is an explicit mechanic that disproves the existence of a "Cultist" third party role.

I'm dense, elaborate

[Charu]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

As well as I apparently as I just checked the rules after your post.

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

I'm dense, elaborate

What I'm about to say may sound sketchy but I was yet again theorycrafting and remembered the mechanic.

Technically, a third party converting role can convert ANYONE right? In FFR TWG, wolves have a night talk QT; which means if choof were to "convert" a wolf to his third party role, that player would also have access to the wolf chat and could out them immediately.

I am literally angleshooting my balls off on choofs role, but it is something that came up in the theorycraft.

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXXV: Dichotomy - GAME THREAD

I'm an open book, I've spilled my guts

You've been speaking in riddles and it's confusing me

If you have something sensitive you want to say, save it for the day phase