TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy! (Cancelled)

[Ruritsu]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

So... you agree with me when I defended Iggy against your inactivity argument.... But you want to lynch me?

If you're refering to me, then you need to reread, seeing as at no point did I agree with you. I did the exact oposite of what you wanted.

My point just was that it seems silly to focus our whole game on the basis of no n1 kill. I'm not saying it means that the wolves weren't inactive, just that it doesn't nessecarily mean that they were. And more importantly, if we focus our game on hunting inactives, we ignore any wolves that might be playing the role of a snake in the grass.

OR maybe its not some far fetched super amazing coincidence and in fact the much more likely has happened and the wolves really are inactive. Why are you pressing this so much?

And if you really did want to try to condemn me for being a wolf (oh no I'm being attacked by ac1), why would you want the psychic to come out if I were a wolf? That's just bad play to try and get the psychic out in the open in which case we lose our psychic when there's still 2 wolves left in the game.

I addressed this already (Actually I more of just rode on the coat tails of AC's suggestion), if you are in fact red, it means, like somebody pointed out, you're defending at least one person, and that we should continue to pursue the inactivity route. If you don't show up red, we probably should put the inactive chase on the back burner. Further if you don't show up red, the Psychic can just bloody remain hidden.

Also.. I like how AC didn't say anything about how we're not drawing on the fact that we completely ignored lynching one very likely candidate that WASN'T active at ALL night 1 (freez) that could be the cause of no n1 kill since you seem so attached to your inactivity theory.

We did lynch Freeze I thought?

I'm not trying to protect anyone, I just wanted you guys to pay attention to alternatives, too and not bet our entire game on one theory.

We're not ignoring the "alternatives" we're just reasonably dismissing them as unlikely seeing as they are really unlikely.

Another issue I have with the inactivity theory is the fact there's a lot of greens. I think it's been mentioned before, but plenty of people check their pm, see that they're a normal human, get immediately uninterested and only come around for the sake of a lynch vote and being pseudo active.

You're smart enough to realize that humans uninterest would not cause a wolf to be missed. The only thing that would cause this situation is the wolves not PMing. The only things that would cause that situation are a wolf group gone MIA, or unreasonably inattentive wolves. I'll take the former any day.

also @ temote
I thought I was being decently active...at least on AIM anyways. Its rare for me to have thoughts that seem important enough for a big post on the thread

I love how everyone (Save for freeze) who argued against the inactivity idea also mentioned that they were active.

ruritsu: lol is it wrong for me to expect him to just go off on someone to prove to me that he's a human? His responses to freeze's defense later in day1 were good imo. But I don't really notice him doing anything else of note. Which of course sends off alarms to me. He's more of a gut feeling of being a wolf. But he would be near impossible to lynch.... which is why that style is so effective for a wolf XD.

Rage, so you guys go off and vote me while I'm AFK. I think I said I'd post some more when I got back from school. Just now back -_-' However, your lynching reasons are just as hard to defend against as it would be to justify my lynching as you say. I can't really respond to this effectivly.

All this said, and although I feel I'm gonna get a lot of slack for this, I'm still voting Vic as she remains suspicious in my mind.

-Prepares for mass ninja posts-

[Temote]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Elaborating a bit more on Iggy's analysis because I was kind of thinking the same thing. (I thought it was just me thinking too deeply on it). He seems to just kind of trying to make us think he's active while not really being active. It's pretty much the exact same way he played wolf on iggy's team (as iggy said). He also sent me a pm trying to question whether I was the psychic or not judging by my recent activity splurge... While it may be a valid question, I'd have to assume it's roledigging, especially since it was done very privately. His human play isn't so bad as to suggest he'd try and ask me if I were a blue and genuinely think I'd tell them whether I was or wasn't. It just doesn't add up to me.

Wait, what? o_O Can you forward this to me or something?

[Ruritsu]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Oh, and a vote count would be nice.

[Viccica]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Ruritsu, I wasn't even talking to you at all.


Like.. ever.


It was all to AC.



ruritsu





Nah just kidding.



tupac


Now for a serious response. Two minutes.

[Temote]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Argo - Rawr, Panda
Iggy - Gun
Tupa - Vic
Gun - Temote
Ruritsu - Iggy, AC
Vic - Ruritsu

Left to vote: Spyke, Tupa, Argo, u84

Unless I missed something during the sudden posting spree.

[Viccica]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

If you're refering to me, then you need to reread, seeing as at no point did I agree with you. I did the exact oposite of what you wanted.

Was talking to AC you loserface.

OR maybe its not some far fetched super amazing coincidence and in fact the much more likely has happened and the wolves really are inactive. Why are you pressing this so much?

As I already addressed, I don't want us to find one idea and roll with it the whole game. Humans are NEVER 100% right with their first assumptions.

I addressed this already (Actually I more of just rode on the coat tails of AC's suggestion), if you are in fact red, it means, like somebody pointed out, you're defending at least one person, and that we should continue to pursue the inactivity route. If you don't show up red, we probably should put the inactive chase on the back burner. Further if you don't show up red, the Psychic can just bloody remain hidden.

Yeah and if I don't show up red you drop someone who's actually trying to contribute to the game... And end up no closer to finding any other wolves.

We did lynch Freeze I thought?

Also adressed, I was using bold for emphasis, not a vote. If you're going to try to argue against me at least read the whole thread.

[Ruritsu]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Ruritsu, I wasn't even talking to you at all.


Like.. ever.


It was all to AC.

That only makes my first response not matter.

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Iggy, stop being ninja'd.
It makes safety voting so much more troublesome.

u84

[Viccica]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Trying to get my cell phone to reconnect to AIM and it's not going very well.... Bear with me.

If it's incredibly urgent, PM me for my number and message it from AIM.

[Ruritsu]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Was talking to AC you loserface.

Oh deary me.

As I already addressed, I don't want us to find one idea and roll with it the whole game. Humans are NEVER 100% right with their first assumptions.

As I already addressed, the only alternative is absurd.

Yeah and if I don't show up red you drop someone who's actually trying to contribute to the game... And end up no closer to finding any other wolves.

No, if you don't show up red, we drop somebody who's actually trying to contribute to the game, and stop our thrash in the wrong dirrection.

Also adressed, I was using bold for emphasis, not a vote. If you're going to try to argue against me at least read the whole thread.

Also.. I like how AC didn't say anything about how we're not drawing on the fact that we completely ignored lynching one very likely candidate that WASN'T active at ALL night 1 (freez)

This makes it seem like you're about to designate said "very likely candidate" and the next thing that pops up is Freeze in parenthesis. Misleading, no? Also your responses seem ill thought out, maybe you should read through everything before you try to argue against me.

(More ninjas?)

[Temote]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

P.S. Ruritsu, she already said she meant to put Spyke, not Freeze. x_x Whoops.

[Ruritsu]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Listen, I've got to go, so my vote stands. I'm not tryin' to pick a fight, so don't take it that way. I'm very open to alternative suggestions, just not "Let's ignore the N1 no wolf, because, inactivity, although the most likely argument, isn't the only argument," absurdity.

[Ruritsu]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

P.S. Ruritsu, she already said she meant to put Spyke, not Freeze. x_x Whoops.

Duely noted, disregaurd that part of the post then, will you >_>

[Viccica]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!



I never ever said ignore it, I said about 10 times just NOT to ignore the fact there are still the people who are ACTIVELY playing.


Garsh.

[Temote]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Poor Spyke is being assaulted with walls of text after a calc final.

=(