TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy! (Cancelled)

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Inactive lurking and regular inactivity are both bad though.

Either way, I have started thinking more and more that this was all just a poor attempt at wolf strategy, and (again) I don't think a vet would do this. However, it's certainly not limited to new players at this point.

In addition to that, BDN brings up a good point what with the possible sneakwagon.

I'd keep looking at players who are inactive, but tweak the filter to players who have less than 10 games' experience (which might actually include me-- I'd have to check). =/

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

oh yeah, safety on rawr
just to take my vote off freeze for now

[Brilliant Dynamite Neon]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

A Suspicion of a Different Color:

You, AC1, despite the lack of disseminated information, have registered a tiny blip on my wolf radar.

Ac1, earlier in the day you were a part of the wagon, yet you call out temote's flimsy reasoning when you have none yourself.

Then you go on and weakly retract your actions, without taking off your vote (you only do so in your post above, after I speak of the dangers of this wagon)

It has all the strength of a wet wafer, but it's still a case I guess.

Ac1.

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

A very wet wafer

[Temote]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Personally, after talking about it and thinking it over, the only way we can actually say that the wolves were inactive is if at least two of them were out of it and the other didn't want to take initiative. I really can't see a situation where two wolves were both on and neither sent in a kill. x_x

Sunday's are a bit hectic for me, so safety on u84 for now in case I can't make it back today.

[Viccica]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Safety on panda


I personally think you're all reading into it way too far, nevermind jumping the gun on voting freez down. Primarily because he's not the only inactive and because I know I've gotten on, posted and still gotten a phantom. In the same way someone can be active but forget to vote, a wolf could have posted and just figured 'oh well I'll just send a pm in later' and then not get on at all.


Inactivity is a poor, poor reason to vote someone down without at least talking to them once. For all you know we could be voting down an inactive blue. Not saying I think freez is psychic or seer, but.. still.


There was something else I had to say and I forgot what it was... ffff...

[Gun92]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

oh.

Got invited by the gf and family so its one of those things. I'm off to work and like I said, I'll do my best to get on later tonight so I can hopefully try to make a real vote instead of a safety.

[u84]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

So because someone doesn't say something Night 1 means they're a wolf? Sense when has this become the standard for voting on Day 1? In fact, I'd say that the majority of players here would make sure they DID post something Night 1 to avoid suspicion because lately, the only thing anyone says day 1 is **** against the inactive. With that in mind, it is possible that the wolves purposely chose not to kill someone night 1 after seeing how many people were inactive. However, I strongly doubt this happened, seeing as regardless how many people were confused by this, it still would take away a very essential kill.

So, TL;DR, look more closely at the active and take in mind AC1's lack of correspondence option.

[u84]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

And I was on, dammit. Just hate the "mandatory" Night 1 post just to "prove" you're human. It doesn't prove ****.

[FreezinIce]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Ugh due to unforeseen circumstances i had no access to the computer for the last 4 days. I should be active now though =/.

*reads the thread*

[FreezinIce]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Oh. So the wolves didn't kill anyone and now everyone is looking at the inactive people.

Well like I said, my inactivity was forced and beyond my control. Being online but not posting is one thing, but not being online with no access to the computer knowing you signed up for twg and it probably already started is another thing altogether.

[Ruritsu]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Freeze, because, I'm all for not going KitB.

That said, I'll agree that Ac/U84 have a point in saying "Well, they could be active and just screwed up," however, I'd much prefer we did vote an inactive, seeing as I find it more reasonable to assume that is the reason for the lack of a wolfing. On top of that, its not like anybody has presented a better lynching reason for somebody else.

...jumping the gun on voting freez down. Primarily because he's not the only inactive and because I know I've gotten on, posted and still gotten a phantom. In the same way someone can be active but forget to vote, a wolf could have posted and just figured 'oh well I'll just send a pm in later' and then not get on at all.

No, but he was the most inactive.
Thats the thing, the reason behind being inactive is unimportant. Having a legitimate reason to not be present doesn't change the fact that you weren't present, and that that is suspicious considering the whole no wolfing thing.

As for the rest: Yeah, they could've just forgotten to vote, but why are you reaching that far. You're going out of your way to make a situation other than inactive wolves that still provides a missed wolfing.

For the record, I'm not attacking you Vic, your post just conviniently contained every idea I wanted to respond to, and I figured it'd be easier this way. My suspicion still lies with the most inactive of players is what I'm trying to say.

[Ruritsu]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

Oh. So the wolves didn't kill anyone and now everyone is looking at the inactive people.

Well like I said, my inactivity was forced and beyond my control. Being online but not posting is one thing, but not being online with no access to the computer knowing you signed up for twg and it probably already started is another thing altogether.

You ninja'd me Freeze (I went to eat and came back and posted without refreshing the page if anybody wants to question the serious amount of time between the posts =P), and this is what I was talking about in green in the post above. The fact that you have an excuse for being offline doesn't change that that is the most reasonable cause for no wolfing that can be assumed.

[FreezinIce]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

I know that the people that were inactive are the most likely people to vote for given the circumstances. I was inactive and due to an unexpected twist I'm paying for it in a way i didn't think possible. All I can say is that I've been set up, and I ask you to consider the other possibilities (Ex: This is a trap) before you barrel on with a plan that will likely get even more humans lynched while the wolves sit back and laugh.

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCII: Welcome Back, Wolfy!

I've always thought that the people who are only semi-inactive are more likely to be green because they'll log in, see their pm and say, "well **** that."