Re: TWG CVIII: Drekk's Revenge
the only thing that helps me sleep at night is winning, and even that barely
anyways manti did two things that are unlike him as a human
1. he called me a hypocrite (manti doesn't tend to look for hypocrites or typically defend himself like that)
2. and he is letting other people dictate the pace of the phase. his one contribution to how the phase would play out was a dumb dichotomy between clasko and ankoacid (hard to read what the intention but it as least contains: (1) trying to get everyone else in the thread to narrow down on these two and (2) an unstated belief that both are wolves if human. it doesn't seem to me that manti particularly believes both are wolves so i'm wondering why this is helpful? does listing clasko in this fashion take heat away from ankoacid, someone he wants to shelter and who i was myopically focusing on? i can't think of any reason this would be a good move unless you specifically believe something about one or both of them (which he did not state)
3. but far and beyond the sketchiest thing he did was state that it was simply a question to promote discussion. he tried to take away the force of the fact that he was intentionally narrowing when he was called out on it, which make his an extremely mercurial move for someone to make and therefore hella-motha-fuckin-balls-to-the-wall wolfy. you either intend to narrow or you don't, and failure to own it behind a wall of semantics is just the most not-human shit that has gone down in the thread so far.
the only thing that helps me sleep at night is winning, and even that barely
anyways manti did two things that are unlike him as a human
1. he called me a hypocrite (manti doesn't tend to look for hypocrites or typically defend himself like that)
2. and he is letting other people dictate the pace of the phase. his one contribution to how the phase would play out was a dumb dichotomy between clasko and ankoacid (hard to read what the intention but it as least contains: (1) trying to get everyone else in the thread to narrow down on these two and (2) an unstated belief that both are wolves if human. it doesn't seem to me that manti particularly believes both are wolves so i'm wondering why this is helpful? does listing clasko in this fashion take heat away from ankoacid, someone he wants to shelter and who i was myopically focusing on? i can't think of any reason this would be a good move unless you specifically believe something about one or both of them (which he did not state)
3. but far and beyond the sketchiest thing he did was state that it was simply a question to promote discussion. he tried to take away the force of the fact that he was intentionally narrowing when he was called out on it, which make his an extremely mercurial move for someone to make and therefore hella-motha-fuckin-balls-to-the-wall wolfy. you either intend to narrow or you don't, and failure to own it behind a wall of semantics is just the most not-human shit that has gone down in the thread so far.
Comment