Re: jTWG XXIV: iTWG
I am busy right now, so I cannot delve too deeply into your post. However, the bandwagoning was pure chance - Thunder and Flaw can vouch that I talked to first Thunder, who convinced me that Flaw was MW, then Flaw, who dispelled my worries. Also, my BS call was on Day 1. I had a right to be suspicious at that point, because the seer [Fiction] had time to check only one person. Yet, it seemed that he seered a person red [a noob, no less] and then messaged a random person about it? It seemed very sketchy, indeed. As for the last quote - it was a possibility, not an accusation.
I am busy right now, so I cannot delve too deeply into your post. However, the bandwagoning was pure chance - Thunder and Flaw can vouch that I talked to first Thunder, who convinced me that Flaw was MW, then Flaw, who dispelled my worries. Also, my BS call was on Day 1. I had a right to be suspicious at that point, because the seer [Fiction] had time to check only one person. Yet, it seemed that he seered a person red [a noob, no less] and then messaged a random person about it? It seemed very sketchy, indeed. As for the last quote - it was a possibility, not an accusation.



Comment