Re: TWG XL: Mall Madness
Are you referring to the "get SK to kill sert for us" idea? This was a VERY good idea, and in doing so, it would have given us an extra lynch, but SOME ****ING RETARDS decided to lynch sert anyway.
I already mentioned above: the SK is totally human in every way. The only way that he differs from humans are that humans want SK dead as soon as possible.
And, let me spell this out completely here:
Situation number 1:
Sert is lynched day 1 and the wolf count is brought down to 3. This leads to the wolves almost certainly killing a human (assuming random choice: 1/12) on night 2. This also leads to SK probably killing a human (3/4 chance, assuming random choice) on night 2. Short version: a wolf is killed day one, then two humans are killed night 2.
Now, look at the instance of us NOT lynching sert.
Statistics say that day 1 lynch would probably have been human, but there are also chances that it could be wolf or SK (I'm not going to throw out probability here at all, because lynch choices are FAR from random). This would have the wolves attacking a human at a chance slightly higher than 1/10. This would also lead to SK killing sert. Short version: A possible red is killed day 1 and a human and a wolf are killed night 2.
So really, ap saying "we need to keep sert alive" is really saying "we need to maximize our potential to kill wolves by using this role that would otherwise cripple us." I don't get what exactly is meant by "ap has acted from the start of of this game as though the SK is a fact of life, and we actually need him for a human victory." Obviously, we don't need him for a victory, but why not use him if we can?
Are you referring to the "get SK to kill sert for us" idea? This was a VERY good idea, and in doing so, it would have given us an extra lynch, but SOME ****ING RETARDS decided to lynch sert anyway.
I think the smart thing to do would've been to start searching for the SK right away.
And, let me spell this out completely here:
Situation number 1:
Sert is lynched day 1 and the wolf count is brought down to 3. This leads to the wolves almost certainly killing a human (assuming random choice: 1/12) on night 2. This also leads to SK probably killing a human (3/4 chance, assuming random choice) on night 2. Short version: a wolf is killed day one, then two humans are killed night 2.
Now, look at the instance of us NOT lynching sert.
Statistics say that day 1 lynch would probably have been human, but there are also chances that it could be wolf or SK (I'm not going to throw out probability here at all, because lynch choices are FAR from random). This would have the wolves attacking a human at a chance slightly higher than 1/10. This would also lead to SK killing sert. Short version: A possible red is killed day 1 and a human and a wolf are killed night 2.
So really, ap saying "we need to keep sert alive" is really saying "we need to maximize our potential to kill wolves by using this role that would otherwise cripple us." I don't get what exactly is meant by "ap has acted from the start of of this game as though the SK is a fact of life, and we actually need him for a human victory." Obviously, we don't need him for a victory, but why not use him if we can?



Comment