jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

NetJet bothers me because his vote was the third on Viccica. It was so early for such a vote that i can't tell if it was an innocent mistake, some rush of confidence, or just trying to seal the deal.

V's vote on Viccica was loose at best, right off the bat. I just don't get how she got three votes so quickly.

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

and I'm voting for V

[Vendetta21]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

and I'm voting for V

care to elaborate on your reasoning?

[Netjet!]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

After talking on aim with people today and yesterday i've found that my suspicions proved not as true as i thought.

although, something about the whole thing didn't seem right. v, your accusation wasn't great but it was enough to make me and james both hop on the wagon...

safety krauthammer for now while I think over this more

[Netjet!]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

*it might have been a mistake but somethings weird about the whole thing to me

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

care to elaborate on your reasoning?

no

[Netjet!]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

V, if you were so sure about your accusation on viccica, you wouldn't have switched your vote to me, essentially targeting me for following your vote. Seems like you used the "umbrella of a veteran" argument in order to discredit me and further protect yourself in the process.

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

v, your accusation wasn't great but it was enough to make me and james both hop on the wagon...

I don't buy this at all.

Hey bro you convinced me of something I now consider an error and I will end with an ellipses to show how disappointed I am with how everything turned out...

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

V, if you were so sure about your accusation on viccica, you wouldn't have switched your vote to me, essentially targeting me for following your vote. Seems like you used the "umbrella of a veteran" argument in order to discredit me and further protect yourself in the process.

wat have you lost your mind

netjet

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

like, that's the whole reason you're suspicious. You weren't the second vote, you were the third! How can you blame V for setting you up?

I imagine my quick vote on V gave you enough confidence to throw a vote on him, as if voting for someone else who has a vote would emancipate you?

[Netjet!]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

i was planning on switching my vote before you even posted, but as it turns out i have the worst timing in the world .

[emerald000]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

Let's see if I get the order of events right:

- V posts a vote on Viccica.
- James does too.
- So does Netjet.
- Viccica explains the misunderstanding.

"(12:39:26 AM) NetJet!: well originally her post did seem suspicious, but i didnt look deep enough into the details. after she released more information about why her post was legitimate (see: "No, the comment on it being unfortunate was genuine") i realized that there wasn't good enough reason to vote for her"

- Netjet reads the explanation, understands that there was no reason to vote for her, yet doesn't remove his vote.

That's the part that annoys me the most. He says he realized that was not a reason good enough to vote for her, yet he didn't remove his vote. He said he forgot (quite conveniently should I add) that you could change votes. Yet, V changed vote right after and NetJet didn't move until I asked him why he kept his vote.

Netjet! (2/6): Vendetta21, emerald000, Fiction
Viccica (1/6): James May
Vendetta (1/6): Netjet

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

I don't understand

[FictionJunction]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

why does this forum still filter caps lock

[Netjet!]

Re: jTWG LIX (59): Back In Black

I think this shitstorm is mostly behind us now, ill be on tomorrow when my brain isn't dead