The Etterna Project

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Untimely Friction
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    wtf mina not only contributed to, but CREATED a quality thread, props on the explanation and time put into this dude. This is a truly magical day.

    Leave a comment:


  • shenjoku
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    Wow really? That seems really dumb, and really easy to fix. Though I've looked at the SM codebase before and that shit is naaaaaaaaasty...so you never know. Maybe I'll take a gander this weekend. Haven't looked in a few years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flossy97
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    Chord cohesion is that jumps, hands, and quads are all counted as the same judgement. Stepmania does the scoring based on how many of each judgements were hit so singles, jumps, hands, and quads all give the same amount of points despite being different amounts of notes.
    Last edited by Flossy97; 08-19-2016, 06:02 PM. Reason: made better

    Leave a comment:


  • shenjoku
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    Originally posted by Dynam0
    Thoughts on removing chord cohesion?? While we're here in 2016 ya know
    What even is this? Never heard of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • lurker
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    chord cohesion is a great feature for people who can't play other VSRGs including FFR
    Last edited by lurker; 08-19-2016, 05:57 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dynam0
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    Originally posted by choof
    this is probably hard coded into the game
    someone would have to hunt down where it is in source code
    but I don't think chord cohesion should be removed. does it even play a big enough part in 4k play to warrant removal?
    It does to the point where someone who has an obviously dominant hand (me) can play dense sections flawlessly when in reality the weak hand was all over the place

    Leave a comment:


  • Staiain
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    Originally posted by Dynam0
    Thoughts on removing chord cohesion?? While we're here in 2016 ya know
    I already asked devs about this, it's way to deep into the code to simply remove it, it'd take a lot of work but i'd love to see that myself

    Leave a comment:


  • choof
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    Originally posted by Dynam0
    Thoughts on removing chord cohesion?? While we're here in 2016 ya know
    this is probably hard coded into the game
    someone would have to hunt down where it is in source code
    but I don't think chord cohesion should be removed. does it even play a big enough part in 4k play to warrant removal?

    Leave a comment:


  • Staiain
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    oh boy, no time for gurrrls cause stepmania is my wife

    damn though it's a nice idea actually
    Last edited by Staiain; 08-19-2016, 05:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dynam0
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    Thoughts on removing chord cohesion?? While we're here in 2016 ya know

    Leave a comment:


  • choof
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    freezes counting as zero is perfectly fine. it -might- fuck with people from the o2jam community who approach charts with noodles in mind, but who cares about o2jam in 2016.
    this looks really neat, but I have a small question. why wouldn't this work out of the box for 6k? I know I'm basically the only person that plays 6k for extended periods of time, but I switch between 6k and 4k within the same session (generally I use 6k to warmup). what issues could I run into?

    Leave a comment:


  • TC_Halogen
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    The premise behind deviance in timing windows is absolutely brilliant, because at the surface, we all see timing windows as chunks, but not as their physical distances in comparison to the central point of timing for a given note.

    Using J4 to illustrate the point (even though it's not necessarily relevant data wise, it still is concept wise): if I get a perfect because I missed the note central point by 22.51 milliseconds, that perfect should be basically worth the maximum value that a perfect can be worth compared to someone who missed the note by 44.99 milliseconds, which should be the absolute minimum that a perfect should be worth.

    I also like the idea of reducing freeze arrow weight to 0 -- it actually helps to add difficulty to charts that utilize them properly with regards to balance while mitigating the unnecessary advantage of getting extra DP due to micro-freezes whose lengths are trivial. You could initially apply a similar concept to life gain as well (not sure if mentioned).

    Solid proposal overall; I could respond to this a bit more in detail tomorrow, perhaps.
    Last edited by TC_Halogen; 08-19-2016, 05:34 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • choof
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    I read this post while listening to this

    Leave a comment:


  • P3Prod1
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    beautiful

    Leave a comment:


  • Nano Desu
    replied
    Re: hello allow me to introduce to u my Wife

    The scoring system to end all lurker dp rants stupid 92.ezes due to stupid cb weights

    Leave a comment:

Working...