TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

[YoshL]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

resolved, all involved parties please send pms to me

[YoshL]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

Night is oven, and Czaru has been found baked into a muffin

Charu is free from spelling mistakes! he was the Doctor

2. seedload
3. zenlyan
7. iluswirliest - Innocent Child
9. dostbankpank
11. mrsplopadlop
12. sealvuh

faces our now 24 ours bleach.

day 3 ends at 4:00 PM EST on Tue, Aug 5th
4 to instar

[cedolad]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

it's going to be an interesting scenario if we ML today, just saying.

[cedolad]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

Backpank

[Charu]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

[cedolad]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

tragic.my heartstrings.

bye charu

[Silvuh]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

soft claim doc in hopes the wolves would just target me instead of psycho. Forgot there was a roleblocker still so it didn't work.

I was trying to get them to roleblock me, hoping they thought I was the real doc and Psycho could get a report, if you had saved her at least we would've had some sort of leverage!

Care to explain yourself?

[cedolad]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

Care to explain yourself?

What else is there that you would like to know?

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

This is so shitty I don't even know what to do.

Also screw you cedo.

I have a shitty idea... doubt we want to follow it but let me think it through

[Silvuh]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

You've made two incompatible claims.

1. Your intent was to be roleblocked by the wolves.
2. It didn't work because you forgot there was a roleblocker.

The only explanation for you making both these claims is if you are the roleblocker.

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

no lynch

[cedolad]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

You've made two incompatible claims.

1. Your intent was to be roleblocked by the wolves.
2. It didn't work because you forgot there was a roleblocker.

The only explanation for you making both these claims is if you are the roleblocker.

Then lets flip me and find out.

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

I thought it through a bit.

See, here's the scenario.
What I mentioned yesterday just got even more crucial for anti-town. They NEED to kill the other in order to win.
I feel we can take advantage of that.

Obviously, we want to nail an anti-town this turn. But if we MISLYNCH, we are at 6 people NOW, down to 5, and we can be drawn to a situation where it is impossible for town to win at all. (1 town, 2 antitown is a draw).


Imagine a no-lynch. We are stuck at 6 people. Worst case for the night, is that we are left with 4 people.
The worst non-losing scenario for town is 2 greens 2 reds.

If the two Greens vote no lynch, then the anti-town are basically forced to target each other or they die. It's a classic game theory problem.

[cedolad]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

cedload

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXI Mis-speling BOM

This sounds ridiculous, but what do you think? I've listed the worst case scenarios in which we can essentially force the anti-towns to attack each other.

Obviously, better case scenarios work even better for town.