jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

[u84]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Naw, Mak, it's cool. Just check out my reasoning. You can find it in the sign up thread.

Kyle, you're just not getting it. It's coming to the point where you're actually annoying me. Ready?

I-don't-want-you-in-here-because-you're-too-good. It-will-****-with-the-new-players.


Did you get it that time?

Then you can't have me or freaky in here. Do you want to play this game? Xception already told you that it's good to have a good player in as an example. Otherwise, it's the blind leading the blind. Besides, I've only played 3 games!

Also, if you use that logic, then freaky definitely can not play, being that he's more of a vet than you are.

And while I'm posting, Hi-top isn't exactly bad either. He's learned the concept of this game pretty quick and would be just as good as I or anyone else. So drop it, accept that you have to let me in and I need freaky, or drop all of the players who have any inkling of an idea of how to play this game.

[rzr]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Ok, good sir, you're still failing to read what I've already said.

Xception says: Have a player who's good in there. It helps.

Rzr says: U84's too good.

Xception says: Freaky's a vet, too.

Rzr says: Freaky is not as good as U84. Freaky's been playing longer. Which satisfies Xception's needs.


Are you, like, able to get it now? I don't want you in here because more than half the players are new. You've proven you're good. What will happen is the new players won't even have a fighting chance. Freaky, on the other hand, isn't as good as you. He understands the syntax and can explain the game to new players and help them along.

You will most likely manipulate them. We've seen you play dirty. Now, stop posting. Your pissing me off. If you still haven't gotten my point you're a complete moron who doesn't deserve to play.

[FrozenAngel91]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

I'm sorry I was going to sign up, but something unexpected came up today and I ended up not being able to. I'll make sure to do it next time though.

I'll read some more rules and look up more things and then I'll try and join the next game, again I'm sorry for that Ilu X_X

Good luck to all in the game

[u84]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Ok, good sir, you're still failing to read what I've already said.

Xception says: Have a player who's good in there. It helps.

Rzr says: U84's too good.

Xception says: Freaky's a vet, too.

Rzr says: Freaky is not as good as U84. Freaky's been playing longer. Which satisfies Xception's needs.


Are you, like, able to get it now? I don't want you in here because more than half the players are new. You've proven you're good. What will happen is the new players won't even have a fighting chance. Freaky, on the other hand, isn't as good as you. He understands the syntax and can explain the game to new players and help them along.

You will most likely manipulate them. We've seen you play dirty. Now, stop posting. You're pissing me off. If you still haven't gotten my point you're a complete moron who doesn't deserve to play.

Fix'd, for someone who usually makes it a big deal not to start **** without proper grammar.

Anyways, manipulation is a main factor of this game, douchebag. I don't want to resort to names, but I'm starting to get pissed of as well.

I see your point, but disagree that the new players won't have a fighting chance. For one, I haven't played as a wolf for more than a day phase and the only experience I have with being a human was in your one mystery game. Other than that, unless you are counting the countless times I "cheated," (even though it said nothing about it in the rules) I was only human one other time, where I was killed on Night 1. So, I say to you, no one knows ANYTHING about my skill level in this game and I have way too little experience to be proclaimed as good. Now, put me in the game, or the TWC will be notified.

[rzr]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

I'll notify the TWC myself. I don't want you to play.

Now, I have the right to deem how good you are. I'll break it down to the rubric of which I posted in the TWC thread:

Contribution: [x]

From what I've seen, when you play you contribute to your sides victory the most. I haven't yet granted you an MVP because you've played dirty, been withdrawn, or others have played better. However, you're very good at hunting down wolves to help the humans, therefore contributing to your team.

Comprehension: [x]

The game you formulated for your mystery game, though not as original as it could be, proves your comprehension of the game.

Strategy: [x]

Your strategies aren't exactly honorable, but are effective. You like to gain people's trust and get their role. It could make you look like a wolf, but doesn't seem to. Your strategy is very well for someone so new.


So, Kyle, there you go. If you try to argue with me further the only point you can make is to prove you're a bad player.

NOTE: Your post had a little improper grammar, too. Also, don't call me a doucebag. I didn't call you any names.

[u84]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

As good as that all is, I still don't have the experience. At this point, I'm too tired to make any arguments, but later tomorrow, if there is still any dispute, than know that I will be in this game because nothing you have come up with excludes me from this game. I am still new, inexperienced (saying that multiple times to get it into your stubborn skull) and just as able to play in this as anyone else. You have no right to exclude me, as your only reason to exclude anyone in the first place was due to inactivity and, well, you pointed out that on your own.

So, with that, I am going to bed. I hope you can muster up enough intelligence to admit defeat. If not, then the TWC should take over from here.

[rzr]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Why do you have to be a prick about it? I'm not letting you play. Being rude isn't going to get me to want you to anymore.

[Makilaz]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

rzr, for ****'s sake. Let him play. We already agreed the only person you could prevent from playing was hoochan, since I'm not even going to get into that. If it was because you thought he was going to be inactive, this would be a different story, but you have NO RIGHT to bar him from playing a jTWG because he's "too good."

[rzr]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Well... I am.

Your word means nothing. Show me the whole Council telling me to do so. Then I will.

[travman301]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Someone come to me on aim about this please.

Also @ rzr. I don't really know how good U84 is at TWG, but it doesnt hurt to have a good player with a bunch of noobs. It helps balance out the overall skill level of the game.

But I dont really know what's going on in the situation, so someone please contact me.

[rzr]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

I got you, Trav. That's why I want Freaky to stay. I'll text you if you don't reply on AIM.

[u84]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

I got you, Trav. That's why I want Freaky to stay. I'll text you if you don't reply on AIM.

I need Freaky in my game. He signed up for mine, too. It makes so much more sense to let me play in this game, giving you a Vet, and let him play in my game, giving me a sufficient amount of players.

[rzr]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

No. Freaky stays in mine. It's people like you that are the reason he quit.

[freakysnots]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

sup, i play jtwg, i don't like twg

(btw, wanted a wwii themed game since i think last year)

Edit: I don't get what the argument was about. I saw that TWG was full so I asked to be a sub. I saw that jTWG was not full, so I asked to be in. So I'm in this game and not TWG. (I didn't read the this thread so I might be off track. Someone explain to me please.)

[rzr]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

I got Gun92 to play. I'll begin things.