jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

[tupacodaman]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

yea, so I've been awake for 26 hours because I had to do a rough draft for a paper that I had just started getting sources for on saturday. I predict an hour nap from 1:30-2:30, then back to class/work/studying . i'll def. update at midnight, i'll have recuperated by then

[Gun92]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Safety on FrozenAngel91...will have something positive later tonight, I hope.

[iluswirl]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

u84 77 (7:46:50 PM): ill ask jump
robertsonarofl (7:46:55 PM): ?
robertsonarofl (7:47:03 PM): jump the bullet is what?
u84 77 (7:47:06 PM): item finder
robertsonarofl (7:47:26 PM): how do you go about aquiring such info
u84 77 (7:47:40 PM): ive talked to everyone
u84 77 (7:47:51 PM): people come out to me
robertsonarofl (7:48:00 PM): why would they do that
robertsonarofl (7:48:06 PM): they just naturally trust you hehe
u84 77 (7:48:09 PM): lol
u84 77 (7:48:20 PM): he may have seered me first
robertsonarofl (7:48:23 PM): ah
u84 77 (7:48:25 PM): cause he didnt until day 1
robertsonarofl (7:48:26 PM): that would make sensse

I recieved that through the grapevine, the night before jump the bullet died. I'm thinking there may be a wolf there. robertsona

[FrozenAngel91]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

u84 77 (7:46:50 PM): ill ask jump
robertsonarofl (7:46:55 PM): ?
robertsonarofl (7:47:03 PM): jump the bullet is what?
u84 77 (7:47:06 PM): item finder
robertsonarofl (7:47:26 PM): how do you go about aquiring such info
u84 77 (7:47:40 PM): ive talked to everyone
u84 77 (7:47:51 PM): people come out to me
robertsonarofl (7:48:00 PM): why would they do that
robertsonarofl (7:48:06 PM): they just naturally trust you hehe
u84 77 (7:48:09 PM): lol
u84 77 (7:48:20 PM): he may have seered me first
robertsonarofl (7:48:23 PM): ah
u84 77 (7:48:25 PM): cause he didnt until day 1
robertsonarofl (7:48:26 PM): that would make sensse

I recieved that through the grapevine, the night before jump the bullet died. I'm thinking there may be a wolf there. robertsona

Alright, I'm thinking u84 or robert makes sense with that convo. But for now, since he's got 2 votes, I'll go with robertsona, until i find out more.

[iluswirl]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

oh and gun, that's not a safety. That's a vote. You can't put 2 safety's on somebody.

[u84]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Changing the vote to a safety on.. Gun92

[robertsona]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

i'd like to bring attention to the fact that iluswirl keeps defending frozenangel
so when jkpolk and freaky voted for frozen, iluswirl tried to defend him
the only reason you would defend someone is if you knew their role
the only role in this game where you know each other's role is wolf
when I vote for frozen, iluswirl does it again.
looking familiar?

[iluswirl]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

i'd like to bring attention to the fact that iluswirl keeps defending frozenangel
so when jkpolk and freaky voted for frozen, iluswirl tried to defend him
the only reason you would defend someone is if you knew their role
the only role in this game where you know each other's role is wolf
when I vote for frozen, iluswirl does it again.
looking familiar?

I'd like to bring it to your attention that you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Gun put a second vote on frozen. That's called SAFETY BANDWAGONING. And besides. Frozen came AFTER me. I guess if you want to try and get me killed, go ahead. But when the time comes and the wolves win because YOU were too busy trying to point out that i'm the one who's being troublesome, it's no longer my problem. You sir, fail. I prove my point. I have nothing against you as a person, but I trust frozen enough that he's one of my last choices for a wolf.

[iluswirl]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

And to add to my point.. Say I was going to randomly get everybody to team up on u84. Would you not defend him if there was sufficient evidence?

[robertsona]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

i don't know, it just seems like your reasoning was
"i am his friend, i can stand up for him"
also, frozenangel bandwagonned both elrayford and ruritsu on the first day

[robertsona]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

also, if you presented enough evidence to make me think u84 was a wolf yeah i would vote for him

[FrozenAngel91]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Just think about it for a second robertsona, why in the world would a wolf defend another wolf?

That's asking to get yourself suspected, and I don't think ilu's that stupid

[robertsona]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

Just think about it for a second robertsona, why in the world would a wolf defend another wolf?

um okay should i even reply to this
alright what the hell why not
OF COURSE A WOLF WOULD DEFEND ANOTHER WOLF
this is obviously because they know each other are wolves
so, if the goal of the game (for the wolves) is for the wolves to win, then they must protect each other from being found out as a wolf, duh!
i mean, that's like saying, "why would a human defend another human"
BECAUSE THEY WANT TO WIN

[FrozenAngel91]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

um okay should i even reply to this
alright what the hell why not
OF COURSE A WOLF WOULD DEFEND ANOTHER WOLF
this is obviously because they know each other are wolves
so, if the goal of the game (for the wolves) is for the wolves to win, then they must protect each other from being found out as a wolf, duh!
i mean, that's like saying, "why would a human defend another human"
BECAUSE THEY WANT TO WIN

But they'd wait, doing it in the day is like asking to die. Doing it at night is much more effective, and 2 wolves who aren't found out is better than one dead and one suspected.

Anyways, I'll let you think what you want, I don't want to hog up the forums with an arguement.

[iluswirl]

Re: jTWG LI: WWII; A Soldiers Tale

also, if you presented enough evidence to make me think u84 was a wolf yeah i would vote for him

I said randomly. No evidence in other words. Cause that's what happened. You voted, but then another vote was tagged on. Therefore, of COURSE i'm going to defend somebody who's got a case to live.