TWG XLVI: For the King!

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

observer for being way more active than normal and posting like he's thinking about what he's posting. I have many many more thoughts on other possibilities, but do not want to tip my hand and help with process of elimination on the guardian to the wolves.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

jesus christ take your vote off of me. I do not know who has the revolver, I only know to whom it was supposedly passed. I do not know if it arrived.

[roundbox]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

oh wait
if anybody knows who had(s) the revolver
say something

[pntballa18]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

talisman knows who has the revolver, but he is not saying who.

[roundbox]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

Dammit, flaw's list is nameless. We don't know who had the revolver or anything else "useful".

well
it kinda contradicts itself for the thieves and all

But this gets me thinking
What if flaw was a thief, coming out as a seer and item hoarding?
Or how about pnt? Item hoarding?

I'm going to state that psycho is an idiot for making up an item.

Also, from what I've said, I'm probably going to follow onto Yesssss's(that's several "s"'s) plan of lynching a thief and am voting for pnt.

[DiscoBobbyPARANOiA]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

OH NOES THE STORYLINE STRIKES AGAIN!

You people are retaded.

[FictionJunction]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

I guess I'll cast my vote on psycho for now.

I just think it's plain reckless and suspicious of him to not follow orders given by someone who came out as a seer (plus, no reason to doubt flaw was brought up) and telling pnt about the item instead.

P.S pnt, if you really think that explosives don't exist in this game just because they don't 'fit in the general theme of the items presented' then allow me to show you something I call logic.

Castles ---> past
Castles ---> present

Medieval items ---> ring, poison, cursed shield, etc, revolver?

revolver ---> powder --> where there is powder there are ---> bombs
bombs = explosives.

P.S.S this is also a game, anything is possible.
P.S.S.S I don't think anyone is daring enough to make an item up and hope to not get caught in a lie quickly.

[DiscoBobbyPARANOiA]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

You look a lot more manly than I imagined.

I'm actually a 12 year old boy thanks.

...

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

that's right, I misremembered.

psycho you still need to explain yourself.

[pntballa18]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

I didn't say they had a color. I said (or meant to say) that they all had a descriptor in front of them, like a color.

Besides the revolver(which I didn't know about) and explosives, this was true.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

pntballa, you told me that you had collected info about items from a number of people, and that you were suspicious because everyone of them had some sort of color to go along with them in their name except for explosives.

however, none of the items listed have any colors in their names.

please explain this.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

xero had a cursed shield last night which he passed to pnt.

who had the other, and who has it now? (if you want to tell me privately that's fine).

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

it doesn't matter which thief wins, it does matter how many people are alive.

[Yesssss]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

In any event, this person should not be lynched. Even in the event that they are a thief, this works to our detriment, as the other thief will then skip town tonight and we still will have 3 wolves left.

Does it really matter if the other thief wins? Besides we don't know if that person is in fact a thief.

I've previously figured out that it is better to lynch a known thief than to not lynch a thief. Simply because the thieves cannot be trusted, seeing as killing the wolves is not their objective. It will also be nice to know that our items will not be tampered with as long as we don't pass them (or unless there is an item that can tamper). The wolves items will not be tampered with either, but seeming as there are more humans than wolves, it will be beneficial towards us.

Of course there's the problem of activity. The person who flaw gave the revolver to may have been sleeping/afk when he received the message and never saw it until it was too late (talisman confirm this if you can). If that person is indeed human, he should give up his items and maybe come out, or at least give a good reason why he didn't give flaw a lucky charm.

Just tell me your guys' thoughts on this.

[Kilgamayan]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

Just to throw something else out there, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that one of the items affects seering results.

Then again I don't know what any of them do beyond what everyone knows.