TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

[Celirra]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

I am the ideal ice cream flavour eh

[blindreper1179]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

I am the ideal ice cream flavour eh

You're superman?

[Celirra]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

i didn't know people actually liked superman flavoured ice cream

my mind is blowing

[Precarious]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

Sure, mass claiming sounds fun. Vt here for the 142577425785th time.

I didn't dumb tell on the wolf number pre, i was saying at 6/7, which i missed 5, would be 2 wolves IF we were using wiki, but we're not, and i doubt we rolled 6/7. 5 may be possible, but ehhhh.


You're wasting your time trying to construe my words honestly.

You quoted me as follows:

Originally Posted by Precarious View Post
we can't even be sure of how many wolves there are for example.

and responded with

What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What. What.

48 Whats suggests you found something really, really objectionable about that statement. And yet you couldn't identify what was obviously wrong about it, as I've pointed out, repeatedly. Probably to the point that people are getting tired of reading it.

If I'm correctly interpreting your word salad above, you're now trying to argue that you knew we weren't using the wiki, yet felt the need to criticize me even though you knew I thought that? That's not terribly believable.

You're wasting your time trying to construe my words honestly.

lol that Freudian slip

[blindreper1179]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

You quoted me as follows:

Originally Posted by Precarious View Post
we can't even be sure of how many wolves there are for example.

and responded with



48 Whats suggests you found something really, really objectionable about that statement. And yet you couldn't identify what was obviously wrong about it, as I've pointed out, repeatedly. Probably to the point that people are getting tired of reading it.

If I'm correctly interpreting your word salad above, you're now trying to argue that you knew we weren't using the wiki, yet felt the need to criticize me even though you knew I thought that? That's not terribly believable.



lol that Freudian slip

Idk what freudian is, but yoshl made it VERY clear that the T roles were updated in OP. Yet you went to the wiki. Not my fault you don't pay attention. You're still wasting your time, and i'm done wasting my time. Try to find anything else if i'm such a wolf bro, come get me. Otherwise, write your pre meditated novels about someone else.

[Precarious]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

I'm not parsing it very well.

I think he's saying that blind is faking not knowing about the dumbtell?

What I'm saying is that Blind reacted extremely harshly to the original statement, a minor mechanical elaboration in the middle of a much larger post. That's fine on its own, even if it feels unwarranted.

But virtually every subsequent reaction Blind had with me yesterday hammered home the idea that he didn't understand what the problem was with my post, which calls into question the sincerity of his criticism. He also argues that he never read the discussion concerning the post (mostly by DBP), having reacted immediately to it after seeing it. Yet if he didn't understand what was wrong with it, how could he have found reason to attack it if he hadn't read everyone else's commentary on the subject? This is particularly true since my own initial reaction post, which he quoted, made note that said discussion existed.

[blindreper1179]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

Let it be clear i say things how i say things for a reason. I literally got mislynched last game because of it. Im not stupid. I've never slipped as a wolf or as a blue.

[blindreper1179]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

Hot cake: pre still a wolf.

[the sun fan]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

Precarious I'm gonna have to level with you
I'm not lynching blind without the same stuff that I mentioned earlier about funnygurl

I do think that you're slightly missing what happened, I really don't think that blind was openly criticizing you without knowing what he was saying, that's not really a blindreper thing to do just as a person in my experience.

He probably did know what he was talking about when he posted what that many times imo.

[the sun fan]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

my vote begins to feel more and more confortable on Xiz btw

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

hey guys

[the sun fan]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

massclaim:
freezin- Vengeful
sunfan- vt
cel- vt
blind- vt
inD-
Xiz-
Precarious-
Tps-
fg-

flipped roles:
Gradiant- vt
Syhto- vt
who_cares- vt
DBP- Gunsmith

current setup:
Vengeful, Gunsmith...
KRRxxxx

assuming no additional roles:
KRRTTTT

TTTT = Mafia Goon, Mafia Goon, Mafia JOAT, Serial Killer

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

last minute arrival, seat of pants, first several posts were meta-posting about not being able to post or otherwise

comment to me implied you were actually reading but it took me saying i'd vote you to get you to say it

this wasn't directed at you but okay

[Celirra]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

i dont like how prec didnt claim

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXXX - OuO what's this? [Game Thread]

if i throw you into that freezin/funny group too, that's like the only way wolves would be doing literally anything

any other outcome is town eating itself alive, which isn't impossible, but lynching lurkers doesn't feel good at 9, but at least it's 9 and not f7

if ya wanna lynch lurkers then who