Let harder files in ?

[Charu]

Re: Let harder files in ?

So maybe 2.50x? :P

I believe on Velocity I used 2.1x

When I switched over to R^2 and eventually R^3 when Flash 9 could be used, I upped it to 2.7x.

[icontrolyourworld]

Re: Let harder files in ?

i play 2.0 on legacy/velo
2.7 on r3

[top]

Re: Let harder files in ?

While I am agreeing with the need to move in with the new, I do personally think the screencut sucks on R^3 lmfao

how so? i used it for a while just so i could get used to R^3 at first. after i felt comfy i switched to fullscreen and fixed my speed to match stepmania, as well as squished the receptors a bit closer. maybe i do agree with you in the end..hehe

[Guest15937]

Re: Let harder files in ?

How much farther can songs actually go before it is just considered absurdly difficult? We already have songs like do i smile, with rolls equivalent to 500 bpm 16ths, or Rave7, which is full of 200 bpm 24ths as well as the second half, which I can only describe as a mega-jumpglut. For example, what difficulty would files such as Disregard, The Others, Vertex Gamma, or Data Drain be if they were in FFR? Also please note that the only people who has AAA'd a song above 94 are Dossar and Samurai (unless you count OWA's AAA of p4u v1, which requires a completely different set of skills than other songs), so it seems to me that if hard songs are added solely because people are out of non-stupid files to AAA, you'd be making a major change over the request of two people.

[HalfStep]

Re: Let harder files in ?

You don't get better playing files you can AAA, more hard files = people get better, more incentive to be good since more files to play. Just because only 2 people can AAA stuff above 94 doesn't mean they're the only ones benefiting from playing them.

[~Zeta~]

Re: Let harder files in ?

How much farther can songs actually go before it is just considered absurdly difficult? We already have songs like do i smile, with rolls equivalent to 500 bpm 16ths, or Rave7, which is full of 200 bpm 24ths as well as the second half, which I can only describe as a mega-jumpglut. For example, what difficulty would files such as Disregard, The Others, Vertex Gamma, or Data Drain be if they were in FFR? Also please note that the only people who has AAA'd a song above 94 are Dossar and Samurai (unless you count OWA's AAA of p4u v1, which requires a completely different set of skills than other songs), so it seems to me that if hard songs are added solely because people are out of non-stupid files to AAA, you'd be making a major change over the request of two people.

The idea is to have harder files so it isn't a AAA-fest competition separated by 1-2 goods per rank all the time.


EDIT: It's a concept that needs at least some attention. Just like how FFR is dominated by easier charts, there has to be a time where the game caters to tier-0, god-like rhythm gamers (that go beyond.) It isn't asking that batches and steppers forcely step omgwtf difficulty songs ALL the time.

[Choofers]

Re: Let harder files in ?

Yo Sk8r I got your back. Shit I have tried R3 as well, played it for about a half a week. Just did not get scores that I normally am capable of. Went back to Legacy and played even better than before. Receptor spacing is honestly just something my mind is having trouble getting past. But I suppose the more SM I play the more likely I would want to switch to R3 and 60fps?

you played a new engine for a few days an expected it to be the same as legacy

you're a quitter

[Choofers]

Re: Let harder files in ?

Exactly, i have zero lag on the legacy engine. And if it goes byebye then so do I... Ill only use this engine.

get a better pc pleb

[NeoMaxx69]

Re: Let harder files in ?

When songs aren't hard enough, do what we do in the itg community. Speed them up.

[RagedBerserker]

Re: Let harder files in ?

you played a new engine for a few days an expected it to be the same as legacy

you're a quitter

Quitter 4 lyfe.

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Let harder files in ?

When songs aren't hard enough, do what we do in the itg community. Speed them up.

I have no problems playing rates on R^3. I don't want a forced hard file to go ingame.

[Frank Munoz]

Re: Let harder files in ?

You can't make way for the new without ditching the old.

I play better on legacy pls dont cut it
jic yall don't get it i use this slightly sarcastically, but in all reality i do play better on legacy but for the progression of ffr it's silly to think only of my needs; especially since i dont even play anymore.

Is it impossible to encode a whole new engine that just looks and feels like legacy but is 60fps?
instead of trying to "fix" legacy(even though it's not even broke *****')
jw
Basically like making an r^4 but it's just a legacy remake

[arcnmx]

Re: Let harder files in ?

Change how the game encodes and whatnot so framers will never ever be an issue ever again.

60FPS as to oppose to 30FPS with no hiccups in files. (I like how it is right now though, with you, if you really want to, play songs in 30FPS still, but I can see that being phased out eventually too, oho).

Longer charts being supported (it's possible now actually, but older engines can't do it).

Well, we should probably update the chart converter to at least make charts that run in 30fps and still have the real musical timing in the chart for R^3 to use. Perhaps I should make this a priority so that all songs released in the near future are ready for it.

As for long songs, I see no reason to not allow them since they can work in all engines - though I suppose it's a bit extra work getting them going on legacy/velo.