PS3 is dead (IMO)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shashakiro
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Originally posted by GamerShadow
    PS3 is going to suffocate Sony, and kill them. It's a shame, because that's where the best FF games are. (They do have some GBA/DS games, but the best ones are for PS1, PS2.)
    1. Sony does other things, too.
    2. Sony doesn't make FF games. If the PS3 died, Square would just port FF to somewhere else.

    Leave a comment:


  • slipstrike0159
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    If you arent going to play it anymore than you can just send it over my way. Its all a matter of opinion and no one is going to sway another in any case so you might as well keep your thoughts to yourself from now on considering this thread is now going nowhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • FRANKKK
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    yeah ps3 is actually pathetic
    i dont even play mine anymore
    my 360 blows it away

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Originally posted by Squeek
    This isn't a battle with Chromer. I'm just putting the facts on the table.

    If you want to keep claiming that it'll "win", you need to prove to me why. Because as it is, the numbers clearly show that it has very little chance of doing it.

    But then again, I'll wait until next year to pass judgement on it. There's no way I could call a two-month old system that's supposed to be on the market for ten years "dead".
    Sorry, I ment (in a playing way) If Chromer, or anybody, wants to say something then do it now.

    I can see after re-reading my post how someing could take offense to that. Im sorry for the mis-understanding

    Leave a comment:


  • tsugomaru
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Grr... I shouldn't have posted. MixMasterLar has just extended it into a serious insult. >=[

    ~Tsugomaru

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeek
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    This isn't a battle with Chromer. I'm just putting the facts on the table.

    If you want to keep claiming that it'll "win", you need to prove to me why. Because as it is, the numbers clearly show that it has very little chance of doing it.

    But then again, I'll wait until next year to pass judgement on it. There's no way I could call a two-month old system that's supposed to be on the market for ten years "dead".

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Well, This is my final bump....
    Last edited by MixMasterLar; 01-12-2007, 09:27 AM. Reason: Dont Ask...

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Originally posted by tsugomaru
    Chromer and Co. : 0
    FFR : 1

    ~Tsugomaru
    Harsh....


    Originally posted by GamerShadow
    PS3 is going to suffocate Sony, and kill them. It's a shame, because that's where the best FF games are. (They do have some GBA/DS games, but the best ones are for PS1, PS2.)
    Like Afrobean already stated, I doubt that the PS, only one of Sony's products, is the only way they make bread.
    Last edited by MixMasterLar; 01-9-2007, 11:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GamerShadow
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    PS3 is going to suffocate Sony, and kill them. It's a shame, because that's where the best FF games are. (They do have some GBA/DS games, but the best ones are for PS1, PS2.)

    Leave a comment:


  • tsugomaru
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Chromer and Co. : 0
    FFR : 1

    ~Tsugomaru

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Wow



    The numbers speak! They seem to say......
    NOBODY WANTS A PLAYSTATION 3! EBGAMES IS DROWNING!

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeek
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Apparently the source of the original quote failed to mention one million as being a U.S. number only. That part was in the original projection. +1 to Sony. That brings them to negative far-too-much-to-count.

    Then ignore that line in my original post, because the rest of it is the meat of the argument.

    It's funny, because the news of this spawned a thread with 200 replies on Joystiq and every so often, you'd see a sony fanboy go "thats shopped duh" because they couldn't believe people didn't want a PS3.

    The facts are right there. If you want more, then here you go:

    Independent product comparisons and reviews. No fluff, no filler — just honest picks backed by data.


    Independent product comparisons and reviews. No fluff, no filler — just honest picks backed by data.


    If you're such a Sony fan that you have to have this console, then there you go. Online distributors have many in stock for you to purchase. There are no shortages. Wii has shortages. The reasons for the shortages are different though. Sony's supply exceeded its demand. Nintendo pumps out 2 million a month and they all sell out.
    Last edited by Squeek; 01-8-2007, 07:18 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • tsugomaru
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Everyone's meeting their goals then. =]

    ~Tsugomaru

    Leave a comment:


  • nforcer06164
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Squeek, I think Sony announced long before Christmas that their goal was to get 1 million "in the pipeline" by the end of the year. It was Nintendo that touted a goal of 4 million sold. Which, according to the sales figures, they seem to have made. We'll know once NPD provides the official numbers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeek
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    I'd like to add something, so thanks for bumping it.



    This is a website where they show what stores have certain items in stock the minute they go on the shelves. Fortunately, they've decided to add some code showing how easy or difficult it is to get these items.

    The three top-selling items of late 2006 were: Tickle Me Elmo TMX, Sony PLAYSTATION 3, and Wii. Let's see how they're doing!

    Tickle Me Elmo TMX: National Availability: 3%
    Sony PLAYSTATION 3: National Availability: 75%
    Wii: National Availability: 2%

    What do these numbers mean? Well, let's take a look at what they mean. And let's ignore Tickle Me Elmo from now on, because it's hard to find numbers about that.

    Sony announced today that it met its goal of shipping one million units out by the end of the year.

    Before I continue, let me remind you that they initially said they would sell four million by the end of the year. And now they've met their goal by shipping one million. Because we all know four million sold equals one million shipped.

    Now, Sony says they shipped one million consoles. Nintendo said awhile ago that they've sold 3.19 million units. Since then, the number has come dangerously close to 4 million.

    We're two months into this race now and the demand clearly shows a change in interest in the public. The PLAYSTATION 3 is 75% available. That means that three out of four retail locations have the item in stock. Further proof of that exists on the Internet by various tracking services of both online and brick-and-mortar retail stores.

    The Wii is 2% available. That means that 49/50 stores you visit will not have one in stock when you go.

    Now, is this Nintendo's fault for not making enough? Clearly, it isn't. They've shipped over four million units in two months, and every one that has hit a retail store has sold.

    What does this mean? I won't belittle you. I'll let you figure it out for yourself.

    Ah, what the heck. I've been dying to say it the entire time.

    NOBODY WANTS THE PLAYSTATION 3

    Lower the price, remove the pointless format pusher, whatever it takes. OBVIOUSLY Sony has been doing something wrong with this console. Once eBay prices went below retail price, nobody wanted to scalp them anymore. Units are being returned to stores. GameStop and EBGames are handwriting signs to post on doors to try to move units as instructed by their corporate official office. Pyramids of units are sitting on the sales floors of various retail stores.

    You cannot tell me people want this. Yes, I'd get one. If it were $200. Will it ever drop down to that price? No. They're already taking a $200 loss on each unit sold. They're not going to make price cuts until they can cut production costs. Microsoft has been in the race for 14 months and the official price has never dropped, and they DON'T use extremely complicated hardware. They're just now breaking even with sales, so they STILL WON'T LOWER THE PRICE.

    Edit: semi-official numbers put the Wii at 4 million sold as of this post.
    Last edited by Squeek; 01-7-2007, 07:39 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...