PS3 is dead (IMO)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • deltro300111
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Originally posted by cC@Zz
    Also learn proper english.
    HURR PEOPLE WHO DON'T KNOW ENGLISH SHOULD LEARN ENGLISH.

    Leave a comment:


  • COry_In_JaPaN
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Originally posted by dead_juggalo
    Dude, our Wal-mart had 3 PS3's in stock yesterday. I knew the things would die down fast. Wii is the way to go.
    Wii and 360..and Tekken 6 is being rumored to be ported to xbox 360.

    Leave a comment:


  • cC@Zz
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Also learn proper english.

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Please delete your post and have a nice day.

    If you're not going to add anything to the thread that's worth reading then dont press "post reply"

    Leave a comment:


  • Francesco Enriquez_=ddr=_
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Why is PS3 Died Already
    why! Tell Me About It
    did you broke the ps3
    it's that true that you broke your ps3
    if not very well

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Thanks for the vids Squeek. I'll see them later and will comment in a day or so.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeek
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    I don't know. I found that odd as well. I guess if it's a PC game first (like Call of Duty, since the guy who made it was in the first set of videos) then they have to decide where to take it.

    I was paying attention but it was late at night, so I probably missed the exact wording. Of course, I saw all 6 videos one after the other, so I can't even recall which video it was in.

    I've never actually figured out how gave development works, either...

    Leave a comment:


  • jamuko
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Wait, how can they make their game before deciding where it goes? I always thought they had to buy the devkit and work with it in order to produce a game that will be compatible with and take advantage of the target system...

    Guess I'll have to watch.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeek
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)



    Lazy bum. First result in Google for Bonus Round Gametrailers.

    And yes, that's pretty much what they mean. 360 and PS3 are video game machines and multimedia centers. Wii is a gaming machine. It does a few other things, but it's primarily a gaming machine. That's obvious since it can't even play movies or CDs.

    It's also a much different target audience. Wii is for everyone. You can't honestly tell me PS3 and 360 are for everyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Afrobean
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Originally posted by nforcer06164
    I'll probably watch it, but I'll ask this first instead: How is Nintendo in a completely different market? They're all video games. I do respect the opinions of the experts, but I at times also question the validity of some of their statements.
    I think that they mean that Xbox360/PS3 are targetted at gamers and trying to please gamers, while the Wii is targetted at everyone and trying to please everyone.

    ps hay squeek a link would have been nice i dont wanna go around looking for **** ya know

    Leave a comment:


  • nforcer06164
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    I'll probably watch it, but I'll ask this first instead: How is Nintendo in a completely different market? They're all video games. I do respect the opinions of the experts, but I at times also question the validity of some of their statements.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeek
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Also forgot to mention: there's a video up on GameTrailers called "Bonus Round", which is an actual televised forum among developers, producers, etc. about the console race. So far there are two episodes split into three parts each (the last one has yet to go up) but they are really interesting.

    The one thing I noticed is that most 3rd party developers will make their game, then decide where it goes. If it's for both 360 and PS3, they're not going to take the time to pretty up the PS3 version. Why? It's complicated and it's a waste of time. It'll probably have a little more polish, but in the end, they're the same game.

    And Nintendo is somewhere else completely. Some companies have been porting games to the Wii, but as we've all seen, those ports really aren't much compared to the games developed specifically for Wii, which the experts say we'll see much MUCH more of in the coming months.

    Finally, they say PS3 will probably outsell 360, but still "Lose", since "Losing" really means it lost the market share it once had. They consider Nintendo to be in a completely different market now, so they don't consider them a part of the race.

    It's an interesting watch for expert opinions rather than bickering among teenagers and college students.

    Leave a comment:


  • Loyal2Death
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    Nintendo has something huge with the Wii. So before you diss people for thinking its better, don't. I'm one of those people who feel that gameplay should be valued much higher than graphics. I'm satisfied, really more than satisfied with the Wii. Don't be surprised if the next console Nintendo comes out with has the same Wii functionality with the HD abilities that the Ps3 and Xbox 360. I stress testing because there are still things floating about around its capability. Once the capability factors have been owned and True HD is mastered, the Next Generation won't be very far off from our own. o.o.

    Sometimes I prefer the over saturated color Blu-ray provides based on those pictures. However, thats for effect and for detail, HD wins. So it's pretty obvious to me, the Ps3 is just too pricy for its worth right now.

    ~-[L2D]-~

    Leave a comment:


  • meno_rocks123
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    My opinion:
    PS3 is far too expensive and needs to get a lot of really good exclusive games.
    XBOX 360 is a nice system with good games but they still have a lot of problems to get out before it gets my vote
    I think Nintendo did a good job with the Wii. They started putting more online games and released some really good exclusive titles. Not to mention the wireless controllers.

    and if you're just getting a system for the DVD, then buy a DVD player. They're way cheaper and you could get an HD-DVD if you really wanted to "see the white spots on the soldier's hats"

    There's my two cents.

    Leave a comment:


  • Squeek
    replied
    Re: PS3 is dead (IMO)

    I kinda want to bump the HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray thread for this, but it's from October.



    This incredibly long URL is some guy who ran the same movie on the three different formats and took pictures to show which one displays the best.

    Honestly, if this is supposed to catch on, I can't see more than 10% of Americans caring about HD. For the first thirty images I noticed maybe one that was significant enough to outright say "HD is much better here."

    Honestly, what's the point? People always say that games get more realistic. Obviously movies will too in HD. But the realism REALLY isn't important. The common joke among those who don't care for HD in games is "I don't care to count the number of nose hairs on the basketball player. I just want to play basketball."

    This guy seems to know his stuff. And after reading, yeah, I can see that HD is better than regular DVDs and HD-DVDs are edging out Blu-Ray so far. Would I ever purchase either of the two? No. His examples are like

    "oh you can see white dots on the hats of the soldiers in HD but not in DVD."

    To which I replied

    "IF YOU'RE FOCUSING ON WHITE DOTS ON SOLDIER'S HATS YOU'RE MISSING THE POINT OF WATCHING A MOVIE."

    Leave a comment:

Working...