I promise you guys I did not lose interest, and once she calms down about this whole "You spend more time talking and bullshitting with internet people than you do with me" thing, I'll be back to kick some wolf ass.
sorry guys. I probably wont be playing any more since my gf (whom I live with) won't let me on the internet for extended periods of time anymore.
so see ya was fun
Originally posted by pedolad
I promise you guys I did not lose interest, and once she calms down about this whole "You spend more time talking and bullshitting with internet people than you do with me" thing, I'll be back to kick some wolf ass.
Aw, you'll be missed! Have fun and be safe and all that. Stop outselling me with your short orders, it makes me insecure lmao
Seeya next time, fam!
Originally posted by Hakulyte
I followed the "by the book" play, but I was reading the "not to do" page.
Originally posted by XelNya
" I'd suck a dick in a dark, dark alley."
Originally posted by YoshL
"i gave you 20 ducks, and spent a lot of time making one of them quack, and pointed at the particular one and asked "is that one the worst quacker"" ... "you could still give somewhat of an answer based on the quality of the quacks, and the other random quacks from the ducks surrounding that weren't the center of focus."
Originally posted by mellon_collie
"I love Wolfe's duck avi so much. Shado's Duck Shrine is the best!!
It's funny if you read the game now knowing that because it's downright hilarious
I saved the page. After some time I plan to re read it.
I really feel like this was my best game but I came up short. It's easy to just claim that Charu also played his best and better luck next time, but I can't shake off the feeling that had I payed attention to Haku sooner while Charu still looked bad, or just still kept riding Charu's ass D3, or noticed that the "....bruh..." comment mirrored Turbo 3 and was his wolftell or anything else We would have won.
I'm still kind of don't believe Charu was a wolf just based on D3 play through.
I feel like I could have invested my entire game trying to get Charu lynched and it would have never worked even knowing he's wolf 100%.
This win was staged against my will.
#ragequit
ps: I don't understand this "objectively speaking best lynch" mentality. I would just violently murder who's in control of the game if I'm having doubts.
It's not cool to do, but it's really the only way for me to lynch a player outplaying me. Otherwise, you're stuck self-destructing forever or chain-voting bad towns praying you're right.
I'm assuming the best players try to stay null to avoid falling down one way or the other.
ps: I don't understand this "objectively speaking best lynch" mentality. I would just violently murder who's in control of the game if I'm having doubts.
It's not cool to do, but it's really the only way for me to lynch a player outplaying me. Otherwise, you're stuck self-destructing forever or chain-voting bad towns praying you're right.
I'm assuming the best players try to stay null to avoid falling down one way or the other.
What does this even mean? All of it, but specifically the bolded part.
Originally posted by Hakulyte
I followed the "by the book" play, but I was reading the "not to do" page.
Originally posted by XelNya
" I'd suck a dick in a dark, dark alley."
Originally posted by YoshL
"i gave you 20 ducks, and spent a lot of time making one of them quack, and pointed at the particular one and asked "is that one the worst quacker"" ... "you could still give somewhat of an answer based on the quality of the quacks, and the other random quacks from the ducks surrounding that weren't the center of focus."
Originally posted by mellon_collie
"I love Wolfe's duck avi so much. Shado's Duck Shrine is the best!!
I cannot picture weaker players not dying systematically every games the exact same way regardless of their alignment.
You can read players for their content.
You can read players for their intents.
I'm just saying that if the sum of the content + intents from one player is overall always superior to one of another player, that player will most likely nearly always win.
The only way to "normalize" this is to make players play a lot of games and create some data out of them so you have a better understanding of if you should let them live because of their play.
The problem is that in case of doubts, the logical answer is always going to be to lynch these players.
It's hard to make everyone question these votes and make them try something different out of a "gut feeling" by example.
Anyone who is good at playing around with content is going to have a much easier time than someone who's reading people well, but can't provide enough meat to make other players want to trust them.
I'm not saying it's a bad thing, but I feel like it's restricting how we can play a lot because you would need a bunch of crazy players to agree to try something unreasonable when it's a lot easier to go for the "easy lynch".
Comment