Re: jTWG XLVI: Chicago
p.s. this is just to clarify something that vash proposed to dooey via AIM and dooey posted in the Player Sign-Up thread:
jungmour2009 (11:21:41 PM): yo
jungmour2009 (11:21:49 PM): jTWG questionnnnnn
Dooeyabillion (11:22:14 PM): sup?
jungmour2009 (11:22:23 PM): so are you putting that rule into effect?
jungmour2009 (11:22:25 PM): that vash proposed?
Dooeyabillion (11:22:30 PM): no
jungmour2009 (11:22:35 PM): where you can be active and not get a phantom for not voting?
jungmour2009 (11:22:40 PM): so safetying is still okay?
jungmour2009 (11:23:00 PM): well, to clarify, safetying "for no reason" is still okay?
Dooeyabillion (11:23:01 PM): yeah, safetys are fine
jungmour2009 (11:23:02 PM): k
p.s. this is just to clarify something that vash proposed to dooey via AIM and dooey posted in the Player Sign-Up thread:
jungmour2009 (11:21:41 PM): yo
jungmour2009 (11:21:49 PM): jTWG questionnnnnn
Dooeyabillion (11:22:14 PM): sup?
jungmour2009 (11:22:23 PM): so are you putting that rule into effect?
jungmour2009 (11:22:25 PM): that vash proposed?
Dooeyabillion (11:22:30 PM): no
jungmour2009 (11:22:35 PM): where you can be active and not get a phantom for not voting?
jungmour2009 (11:22:40 PM): so safetying is still okay?
jungmour2009 (11:23:00 PM): well, to clarify, safetying "for no reason" is still okay?
Dooeyabillion (11:23:01 PM): yeah, safetys are fine
jungmour2009 (11:23:02 PM): k
Comment