Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
I'll be doing this eventually
2026 TWG Rules Thread
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
A section with common abbreviations would be cool. I still don't know some. (Wifom, iso, etc like you did with knife in the box)Leave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
i agree with all of these rulesLeave a comment:
-
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
are you suggesting hosts start refusing a player's request to replace out?Leave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
i think here, the onus is on the host for this.yea sorry to hear that zenith
see imo the reason for replacements should be serious stuff, not just you dont wanna play anymore. it's unfortunate that the system is abused in the past that it leads to people speculating "oh so and so replaced out, which they would only do as a wolf". some people come to mind that fit that criteria and i have those thoughts too, but it shouldn't be allowed.
I will be finding the bit i had written up about keeping track of a points system to deter afk=ing through a game at some point laterLeave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
yea sorry to hear that zenith
see imo the reason for replacements should be serious stuff, not just you dont wanna play anymore. it's unfortunate that the system is abused in the past that it leads to people speculating "oh so and so replaced out, which they would only do as a wolf". some people come to mind that fit that criteria and i have those thoughts too, but it shouldn't be allowed.Leave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
Now see, there was no hint or mention of this. This is literally the first I've heard of this news.
Sorry to hear, bro.Leave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
it kind of comes with the territory.
replacements are a kind of necessary evil, and replacing into a game p much sucks. In this particular instance, AA salvaged it about as best as he could've, and I don't think he died because of the fact that he replaced in or anything, but its kind of hard not to get a read based on someone replacing outLeave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
holy ballsacs zenith!Leave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
It's still comical to see you guys thought anger was the main driving point on that replacement-- my cousin overdosed and died on heroine-- which didn't help an already unstable Zenith at that time.
Also Rule 2 should specify clearly that in a mystery setup it is okay to reveal your role PM (not word-for-word, but the idea of what you are capable of) because it has happened in the past and if someone were announcing what type of role they have they shouldn't be modkilled/banned for it, specifically in a mystery game. In a normal setup, yeah, don't mention it unless you are claiming.Leave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
True, but from the perspective of the person who's taking the time and effort to replace in, this would leave them in a pretty sucky position ex: AA in that game.Leave a comment:
-
Re: New TWG Rules Proposal & Discussion
if it has to be one or the other, which is kind of is, but if I was to get rid of the "frowned upon," I'd simply make it legal rather than illegal, because a person is going to have thoughts on the action of replacing out, and its really, really dumb for a person not to comment on their thoughts for a pretty silly reason imo, even though I was the one pushing for it to be illegal beforeLeave a comment:
Leave a comment: