Penalties on the OP seem perfectly acceptable. The infraction on Snowcrafta is a bit of a fine line that would be up to Xiz/Manticore given that he was banned throughout most the game...
They really should correlate, but it's contestable.
EDIT: rather, the point that I'm trying to make is whether or not you should infract users for being replaced in situations like Snowcrafta where you receive a short ban and then cannot post because of said ban
I personally think that it's fine, given that it would take the player willingly infracting themselves on three separate occasions beforehand. If a player is willing to break their commitment multiple times to a TWG game, they probably shouldn't play at all.
the jump just seems really high to me. a 3 game ban takes roughly a month, and then the next rung of the ladder is perma.
resetting after 10 games without incident could also be lowered imo. 10 games is a lot of games.
If we're running them 2 at a time like this then it's a lot faster.
I don't have anything against Snowc, but if we're giving Kayla an infraction for her request to be replaced (even though she was active) we should give one to Snowc. His behavior was ovbiously not forum acceptable elsewhere, and because of this his role was unreadable untill danceguy subbed in.
Negative impact there too, just on the opposite end of the spectrum.
AAA's = 800
Originally posted by V
Manti, I apologize for insulting you. Let the record show that I am a prickass douche, and not only that, but that I am a terrible player.
Comment