Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Muqtada al-Sadr
    FFR Player
    • Feb 2007
    • 11

    #16
    Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

    Stoning begins at 7:00

    Comment

    • Nyokou
      ( ̄ー ̄)
      • Apr 2005
      • 4247

      #17
      Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

      Originally posted by g4z33b0
      Explainnn?

      o look i found it. ;]

      uh, yah. basically, she sent nudeess to like 10+ people on FFR.
      i saw them too. nothing special, bad angles. she's fat and has cellulite.
      Snapchat: icequeenilse

      Comment

      • SethSquall
        FFR Player
        • Mar 2004
        • 5477

        #18
        Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

        Lmao. Smile of the day goes to Tibs.
        Originally posted by Tibs
        I love you, you Welsh ****

        Comment

        • Lamoc
          FFR Player
          • Nov 2006
          • 551

          #19
          Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

          Ok this is one of the stupidest things i've ever seen. Wth is wrong with our goverment. People can do what they want when they want among themselfs. There are so many ways this case is rediculous. Now if the guy raped the girl or something, thats different.

          Comment

          • GuidoHunter
            is against custom titles
            • Oct 2003
            • 7371

            #20
            Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

            What do you mean what's wrong with the government? That's child pornography, no matter who took the pictures. And even though they weren't going around showing all their friends, the pictures were still distributed (even if just to each other, via email) and other people found out about them.

            It's child porn, something pedophiles drool over.

            There is some murky water here, I realize, what with doing things in your own home and whatnot, but there's really not enough information here to just blow off what the police are doing as idiotic.

            --Guido


            Originally posted by Grandiagod
            Originally posted by Grandiagod
            She has an asshole, in other pics you can see a diaper taped to her dead twin's back.
            Sentences I thought I never would have to type.

            Comment

            • archbishopjabber
              FFR Player
              • Dec 2005
              • 268

              #21
              Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

              The government has no respect for people's liberty. If two people want to shoot a home video of themselves doing whatever the hell they want, so long as they don't distribute it there shouldn't be an issue. If the government has the resources to waste on matters as stupid as this I think it is proof that we pay to many taxes. We need a major downsizing of the government so people an at least have some semblance of this so called "freedom" Viva la Revolución!
              "Knowing information legitimately lessens genuine error. Ordinarily, research generates excellent benefit understanding social history."

              "Guide to Freedom." Vol. 9. Page 11




              Comment

              • L O O K U P
                FFR Player
                • Feb 2007
                • 6

                #22
                Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                well i think its good that they were charged. first of all there teens, they should'ent be doing that stuff and how do u know they dident distribute it.

                Comment

                • JKPolk
                  tool
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 3737

                  #23
                  Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                  Originally posted by L O O K U P
                  well i think its good that they were charged. first of all there teens, they should'ent be doing that stuff and how do u know they dident distribute it.
                  They were 16 and 17 IIRC. That seems old enough to me.

                  Comment

                  • tkoy
                    FFR Player
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 308

                    #24
                    Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                    L O O K Up, Ur Just Saying That Cause U Cant Get Any

                    Hahahah

                    Comment

                    • who_ur_daddy
                      FFR Player
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 1

                      #25
                      Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                      sweet

                      Comment

                      • L O O K U P
                        FFR Player
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 6

                        #26
                        Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                        oh i dident know they were 16-17 i dident read all of it, well hell then they should be allowed.
                        Last edited by L O O K U P; 02-14-2007, 03:34 PM.

                        Comment

                        • JKPolk
                          tool
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 3737

                          #27
                          Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                          Also, Lookup, work on your spelling if you want to be of any use to the board.

                          Comment

                          • WarlockRox
                            FFR Player
                            • Apr 2006
                            • 88

                            #28
                            Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                            Found on Fark?
                            Anyways, this is ridiculous. If you're 16 or 17, then you should be able to take pictures of yourself naked if you want to. Besides, 16-17 isn't the age range a paedophile is usually looking at-they look too much like adults already. (Usually, anyways.) But hey, whatever. It wasn't me, so I don't really care.



                            ^ Link ^

                            Comment

                            • Shadowangel510
                              FFR Player
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 34

                              #29
                              Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                              OMG!!! Really thats kinda... Wow! Better delete those pics of meh <.<
                              "Orly? No get the F@&# away from meh!"

                              Comment

                              • Chrissi
                                FFR Player
                                • Mar 2004
                                • 3019

                                #30
                                Re: Teens charged for possession of child porn... of themselves...

                                Me and my at-the-time boyfriend did this sort of thing when we were about 16.

                                I think it's pretty common, and we never shared it with anyone else....

                                I don't see why this is an offense. Sure, it's TECHNICALLY against the law, but we have minds for a reason - to figure out things like this are stupid.
                                C is for Charisma, it's why people think I'm great! I make my friends all laugh and smile and never want to hate!

                                Comment

                                Working...