TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    Hey Gradiant if you don't like my play I'll be happy to sit on the side and watch you do some work for a change

    Pretty sure you owe town something anyway since you largely sat out last phase

    Leave a comment:


  • Gradiant
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    nice tunnel

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    me being alive is some weird ass gamble because wolves are in a tight jam and feel that they can worm themselves out of it if it's a point of contention...which actually makes almost no sense but I believe it before I believe all 3 of us are town

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    1 ok let me put it this way: I dont believe you would do that. That claim smells of bullshit and you think I'm retarded if you believe for one second I would buy that fake ass "what have I said about someone that could be a soft" soft.

    2 literally acknowledged that's what anyone would answer with.

    I'm asking why you would decide that your rule is lame, and I have a feeling that the answer is you didnt.

    3 well you got your wish man, I just gave you my thoughts on that world and yo, I don't think it's believable for a second, mostly because I'm alive.

    Because me not giving then enough credit is nonsense when I have to turn around and say "oh they kept the one role that could seek them out alive after playing so smartly"

    Leave a comment:


  • roundbox
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    unvote for now

    Leave a comment:


  • roundbox
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    Originally posted by MixMasterLar
    1. I mean there's addmited precedent that you never soft and for this one game, with no seeable catalyst at the time, you broke it to soft something nobody (as far as I know) who has rolled that role has done.

    And before you point it out, yes precedent matters, as that's basically what a meta read is (your defence of Raeko heavily relied on the precedent she sat for herself in your mind, does it not?) 2. So yeah, this matter. I want to know why this game, why now and of course the point is to give more info you know what I'm asking here

    You can either work hard for me to give you the benefit of the doubt or I can just assume I'm right that you're wolf and not even engage with you.

    That fake looking soft, especially since it's existence makes you look worse after you criticized mine, sat you back reeeeeeeaaaallll far bucko.



    I'm already tired of you throwing this out as if it had a point.

    3. In the world where all three of us are town's then basically wolves have had the easiest game ever watching Wayward and FFA basically give them 2 free phases and a cop claim.

    Wolves also feel really confident killing that cop claim since there's no need to gamble by keeping him alive; they will already be so well hidden and the heat be so focused on your actions that they basically get another free phase.

    It makes no sense and you have yet to explain to me how it could make sense. All you do with this logic is whine that I'm not considering it enough for you.
    1. What does it matter if someone playing a blocker in some random game has claimed or softed in this way? I see zero reason for this to be a point held against me. How other people have played the role has no bearing on my play this game.

    2. Already answered in this quote below.
    Originally posted by roundbox
    In the event that I was nked before claiming, I gave information so people could go back and comb my posts. I was unsure if there was a SK or any form of vigilante in the setup, so there was the possibility that I die before I could claim. If I died, people could find it in my post. If multiple kills happened N2 (and I was one of them), then they could see if my first block did anything and evaluate Gradiant.
    I don't know what you mean by "you know what I'm asking for"
    I'm dead serious

    3. That's the way I'm seeing the game right now. I want you to see it that way as well so you can realize what deep shit town was in the first two phases. You making this post is not giving the wolf team enough credit. I think they've done a fine job so far, minus the part where they didn't kill you for some reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    Originally posted by roundbox
    1. I'm not sure, but I don't see how that would negate anything about my play.
    I mean there's addmited precedent that you never soft and for this one game, with no seeable catalyst at the time, you broke it to soft something nobody (as far as I know) who has rolled that role has done.

    And before you point it out, yes precedent matters, as that's basically what a meta read is (your defence of Raeko heavily relied on the precedent she sat for herself in your mind, does it not?) So yeah, this matter. I want to know why this game, why now and of course the point is to give more info you know what I'm asking here

    Originally posted by roundbox

    Don't fall into the trap of assuming exactly how everyone will play. You seem to have a habit of assigning what YOU would do in the situation (imagining yourself in my slot) and assume people would play like you.
    I dont.

    See my read on Haku for an example from this game, and my continuous explanations (that you yourself mutiquoted) that I expect different actions from different people and you'll see it's obvious I dont.

    If you're telling me not to try and have expectations then lmao I wish we could Insta you right now.



    Originally posted by roundbox

    Not only that, but saying that "the onus is on you to prove to me that you can't have that bad of an EoD as town" is setting up the most loose fucking goalposts ever.
    You can either work hard for me to give you the benefit of the doubt or I can just assume I'm right that you're wolf and not even engage with you.

    That fake looking soft, especially since it's existence makes you look worse after you criticized mine, sat you back reeeeeeeaaaallll far bucko.

    Originally posted by roundbox
    want you to consider the fact that the top 3 targets of last lynch—you, me, ffa—were ALL TOWN. This is where our mindset should be at, not you laser focused on me.
    I'm already tired of you throwing this out as if it had a point.

    In the world where all three of us are town's then basically wolves have had the easiest game ever watching Wayward and FFA basically give them 2 free phases and a cop claim.

    Wolves also feel really confident killing that cop claim since there's no need to gamble by keeping him alive; they will already be so well hidden and the heat be so focused on your actions that they basically get another free phase.

    It makes no sense and you have yet to explain to me how it could make sense. All you do with this logic is whine that I'm not considering it enough for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    Originally posted by Daikyi
    continuing hypotheticals, i'm trying to figure this out rn

    why does antori claim 1 shot roleblocker here, when there's a contingency on having a roleblocker CLAIM in the game
    could have rced roundbox or had the rc blocked

    Leave a comment:


  • roundbox
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    Originally posted by the sun fan
    raeko (1)- wv
    wv (5)- Haku, Lar, Gradiant, inD, Shado
    ffa (3)- roundbox, Antori, Daikyi
    roundbox (1)- Xel
    inD (1)- ffa
    Xel (1)- star
    shado (1)- raeko
    Originally posted by the sun fan
    ffa (5)- Daikyi, inD, Gradiant, raeko, roundbox
    Gradiant (1)- Antori
    raeko (1)- Haku
    roundbox (2)- Shado, Lar
    Daikyi (1)- ffa
    unvote- Xel
    now with groovy colours (NOW including haku's claim + results)

    Leave a comment:


  • roundbox
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    Originally posted by the sun fan
    raeko (1)- wv
    wv (5)- Haku, Lar, Gradiant, inD, Shado
    ffa (3)- roundbox, Antori, Daikyi
    roundbox (1)- Xel
    inD (1)- ffa
    Xel (1)- star
    shado (1)- raeko
    Originally posted by the sun fan
    ffa (5)- Daikyi, inD, Gradiant, raeko, roundbox
    Gradiant (1)- Antori
    raeko (1)- Haku
    roundbox (2)- Shado, Lar
    Daikyi (1)- ffa
    unvote- Xel
    now with groovy colours (not including haku's claim + results yet)

    Leave a comment:


  • Daikyi
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    continuing hypotheticals, i'm trying to figure this out rn

    why does antori claim 1 shot roleblocker here, when there's a contingency on having a roleblocker CLAIM in the game

    Leave a comment:


  • Daikyi
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    indheart actually said basically what i said a post earlier whoops lmao

    Leave a comment:


  • roundbox
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    wait, what the fuck, you think antori and I are on the same team??
    why are we both claiming different levels of roleblocker
    how does that make any sense

    Leave a comment:


  • roundbox
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    Originally posted by MixMasterLar
    1. In what game has anyone EVER softed a block anyway? 2. Is there a precedent for that? If there isn't, why did you decide to break tradition and do so now? 3. Why did you wait until a massclaim was underway instead of claiming and using your soft when I pressured you, instead of appeal to emotions?
    1. I'm not sure, but I don't see how that would negate anything about my play. This point doesn't make any sense.
    2. I don't know if there is a precedent. In the event that I was nked before claiming, I gave information so people could go back and comb my posts. I was unsure if there was a SK or any form of vigilante in the setup, so there was the possibility that I die before I could claim. If I died, people could find it in my post. If multiple kills happened N2 (and I was one of them), then they could see if my first block did anything and evaluate Gradiant.
    3. I didn't think I was being lynched and I wasn't about to hand the wolves a second blue claim. FFA had much more traction and wasn't the outed cop, so I voted him.


    Don't fall into the trap of assuming exactly how everyone will play. You seem to have a habit of assigning what YOU would do in the situation (imagining yourself in my slot) and assume people would play like you. I have acknowledged several times that my EOD was ass, and my constant insistence that I was town was more than just hollow words that I was planning on backing up with my eventual roleclaim.


    Not only that, but saying that "the onus is on you to prove to me that you can't have that bad of an EoD as town" is setting up the most loose fucking goalposts ever.

    ---

    I want you to consider the fact that the top 3 targets of last lynch—you, me, ffa—were ALL TOWN. This is where our mindset should be at, not you laser focused on me.

    Leave a comment:


  • MixMasterLar
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread

    Roundbox if you are really telling the truth I'd like you answer each and every one of those questions I asked at the end of that post.

    If you don't want me to automatically conclude you are making no sense and just scrambling then the onus is on you to prove to me that you can have that bad of an EoD as town.

    Leave a comment:

Working...