Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
i dont see you pushing raeko at all you're really convinced on lynching town instead, I'm not wasting vote on you today since i stopped wolf reading you after Xelnya died instead of me. i can't fit you into any wolf-team convincingly either so stop it with lynching people for D0 reasons i think game has advanced enough beyond that for better people to vote on especially after this last EoD
what are you trying to achieve with this, i dont see why you're still voting me for a play i made on d0, at first i thought that you were a wolf(godfather) who's taking advantage of Lar's check but maby you're just playing this bad into the game
we should look into starting a PR claim since so many PR are alive it would be good start to PoE wolfs/false claims
if i were at EoD i would of helped you with raeko wagon so hard especially after reading the quotes of her in this post
i laughed at first but after the flip I'm starting to look into this, it looks a bit bad for you but maby I'm reading into it too much, I'd like to think that the wolfs look really towny even for me since we've mislynched twice now
i suspected you abit at the start but your push on FFA seemed really genuine in my eyes even if it was a bad push, the way you played seemed like you were staying low and hinting at people that stayed out of the spotlight, if you were referring to me asking star not to vote you that was less on me hard-town reading you and more me expecting more out of star-crossed in terms of voting suspicious people, in other words if star had voted say inDheart/hakulyte at the time i would of done the same
I'm sad noone caught onto this
TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
OK seriously,
Gone nowLeave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
That doesn't matter and I've already explained why I feel that way:
I specifically made the post in a time and manner where I expected people to ignore it at first, it is a soft after all.
But the video and the invisible text should spell it out, and since the tone is so out of whack from what I was posting at the time (I feel good about this game?) I expected anyone who was diligently rereading my ISO to find it and look at it closer, probably in a quote.
Wolves do not reread ISOs to actually do detective work so the way I hoped it would go is that any town going back would see it, any wolf wouldn't give a shit.
Also something something it's a hardclaim in a sense I mean you seem to feel that my calling it a soft was invalid for that reason really just makes whatever logic your pushing seem that much more phony to me.Leave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
requoting this oops. Considering the sk, I'd probably agree. with only one nightkill both nights, either sk would have to deep play and nokill both nights or there'd have to be a roleblocker that both nights hit a killpower.
Either way, I'm concerned that not only did mml not die, but if mml is town here and wolves also believed the claim, I didn't die either being confirmed town.Leave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
looks like I missed the details on lar's check last night, my badLeave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
look, you've had three people come in and tell you that your soft was so vague and abstract that they didn't pick it up
I was in the position of being one of the three lynch candidates, so that's why my read of you was pushed so high into the spotlight
Xel was also leading a case against you, but he's dead now. RIP
I encourage you to look for worlds of wolf teams that don't have me as one of the members
any relationships you find between me and my "partners" are not relationships at allLeave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
I don't know if Im blocked or if it was because my target died
It's actually really weird that he was the target anyway
Also if I was saved and the SK picked a target he thought the wolves would never (which lets face it, do-nothing-and-then-push-a-mislynch-Xel fits the bill) then there's still a world where two killing forces double stack on Star night 1
I basically dont think this is a safe assumptionLeave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Now if you excuse me, I didnt think I would live so I made promises that I need to keep.
There isn't that much to discuss right now though until we get everyone still active in the game to chime back in and catch up anyway, so I'll be off for awhileLeave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
considering we've had one NK per night and lar was blocked, I think it might be safe to start assuming there is no serial killer in this setupLeave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Roundbox you are never town hereLeave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
I gave the gradiant posit because he called your check into question (being safe)
I'm not calling your check into question. I'm not pursuing a world in which you are not a cop, larLeave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
But yeah, obviously the post isn't that obvious it's a softLeave a comment:
-
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Keeping a vote on someone who soft (Or by his admission this phase, basically hardclaimed in a sense or whatever) is absolutely forcing a hardclaim, and if you read the progression of his votes he is playing the timer there.
I specifically made the post in a time and manner where I expected people to ignore it at first, it is a soft after all.
But the video and the invisible text should spell it out, and since the tone is so out of whack from what I was posting at the time (I feel good about this game?) I expected anyone who was diligently rereading my ISO to find it and look at it closer, probably in a quote.
Wolves do not reread ISOs to actually do detective work so the way I hoped it would go is that any town going back would see it, any wolf wouldn't give a shit.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: