jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

[StoicRoivaS]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

I'm really new here, so someone please correct me if I'm totally off. While glancing around the forums occasionally, I'd say the names LK, FFR4EVA, vash, and chicken ring the biggest bell in my mind. Granted I've read very little here and claim to be no expert, but if chicken has played in a few games, which I believe he has, wouldn't this at least slightly suggest that the wolves are not totally new to FFR? Going back over the list of players and my brief experience with FFR, that would place slightly less suspicion on jwcgator, fojar, whiteflame and nicamus, based on this extremely loose theory. I'm not claiming any truth here but more so asking for confirmation of some sort by anyone who's been around the forums longer than I have. This is my first game and I've probably pointed out something that everyone here would see in their sleep, but let me know what you all think. Take care.

[whiteflame]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

stuff, care.

Yeah i've played since the first jtwg...so yeah...

[FFR4EVA_00]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

Stoic: I have been on FFR for a long time, but this is my second jtwg. Chickendude has been playing here for a while, so that might mean that, as you said, the two wolves know what they're doing. But what if they're n00bs who have read all of the jtwg's and decided that chickdude would be a threat? Or what if they just randomly killed him for no good reason?

Anyway, no one voted yet, and I'm definitely not going to be the first to vote.

[vashthestampede0987]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

xobserverx for being a vet and staying away from the game.

[whiteflame]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

Has anyone actually been talking with each other? We should probably set up a chat soon, get some convo going.

Vash your post just went to nothing. He was here before you. GG, vash for ignorance.

[xObserveRx]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

staying away from the game? What're you talking about? This is the first time I've seen you here all game. Also, where's WF been? and Necamus, and well... you get the point. I'm actually one of the few people who HAVE been hanging around.

[whiteflame]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

Someone needs to get this stickied before I cap a bitch

haha damnit I didn't see you had the first post in the thread when the game actually started...retracking my statement about him being here first...but my vote still stands.

[xObserveRx]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

first post, big deal. So he was here for the first two minutes of the game, what does that prove?

[vashthestampede0987]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

Rofl, I actually hadn't seen observer and felt like throwing a vote out there BECAUSE NO ONE IS ****ING DOING ****. Necamus better start talking.

[jwcgator]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

vash, for lack of good reasoning.

[StoicRoivaS]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

Whiteflame and FFR: considering what I was thinking about earlier, who would you say are the most experienced players in this game? Conversely who can you spot as being entirely new to TWG/jTWG? Not that I want to run with this very superficial theory just yet, but it's worth a thought, to me if no one else, because I don't have much else to go on at this point.

Placeholder goes to Vash as of right now, until/if I have someone better to vote for. I might end up having a busier day than I'd like tomorrow so I'll try to get my vote in now, as educated as I can make it. I get the feeling Vash is just being himself here, but if that's the way it's always going to be, I don't feel the slightest bit of remorse voting for him. If you have any better suggestions for my vote, Vash, feel free to post them. I'm willing to listen to anything rational you have to say.

[FoJaR]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

i would love to vote for vash right now, simply because i think he's an idiot, but because he's got some votes, i'll hold off until later.

i need to get some AIMing going on.

remember, dont shoot if you can see the whites of their eyes.

[Necamus]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

First off, it's Necamus. Not Nicamus.

Anyways, I'm still grounded, so I sneak on here when I get a chance. This weekend I'll try to be on enough, but I have a busy weekend planned. Trap shooting all day Saturday, a party that night, then I'm getting confirmed at my church on Sunday.

It seems that the first day, the same old thing is thrown around, but I can never remember if it actually held true in the end or not. It's always "Oh, they killed a vet, they must know at least a little about what they're doing," or "Oh, they killed a noob, they must be trying to trick us." Or anything along those lines. Far too insubstantial to want to make a vote on.

On the other hand, Vash is acting schizophrenic. Don't know what to make of that.

[xObserveRx]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

Essientally, Necamus is right. Day one is USUALLY based on nothing substantial, but due to LK's rather odd first comment, I'll placehold with him right now.

Lightknight

[Necamus]

Re: jTWG XX: Trouble on Board.

Aye, LK is acting a little weird. He should have known what not getting a PM meant. But, he also seems to have been the only person who tried to get all of us talking together.

Either way, I'll try to make another post either later today or sometime tomorrow with any further thoughts.