Ingame Song Information

[mhss1992]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

yeah, the file is ridiculously dumbed down. And you can't even compare the trills to Pianocore's, they're like twice as fast in Piano

I know, I know. But not "Twice" as fast.

[Niala]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

I'm Sick of Uprock is a good chart. One of the only good ones released lately. Ripoff was the ripoff. (See what I did thar? )

[One Winged Angel]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

lol someone bump coactive up to FGO please

[jimerax]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

lol someone bump coactive up to FGO please

forgot about it but I was thinking of that

can someone show me a replay (link) of it for the confirmation?

[One Winged Angel]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...play/56512556/

something like 110?bpm 64th bursts lol

yeah, I know we're not supposed to base difficulty ratings on our own scores but I've got every FMO down to 3 goods or under yet can't break 6 on this

[jimerax]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

ok it has decent PA difficulty, if several burst patterns aren't jumptrill'able (12-34 or 14-23), it's FGO worthy.

but it's not difficult except for bursts, so 83 or 84, quite borderline overall.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

I wish I had this token. -__-

I've AAA'd it offline twice now. About the difficulty, all of the rolls can be jumptrilled, but some of them don't flow nicely with the patterns after them, so you are forced to roll a few (like the 21342134 one). That's really fast too, haha. 218 BPM 32nds? Not very nice.

[One Winged Angel]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

haha well maybe I just suck at rolls then, but aside from rubix's AAA, the scoreboard's a mess

but yeah, it's a support token, not everyone plays it, blah blah blah...nonetheless, I still think it's FGOworthy

[qqwref]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

I've played it offline and I put my vote in for low FGO. It is a lot harder to PA than it looks from a replay.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

Oh, if it wasn't apparent in my last post, I also vote for low FGO.

[jimerax]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

well it doesn't require speed/stamina and the rest us easy but it's hardter to PA than some of low FGOs, so moved it to FGO.

[Niala]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

Really? Based off the replay, I'd say 84, personally. Most of the 64ths look like they can be jumptrilled, and the rest doesn't seem very hard... I dunno, might just be my kind of chart, I guess. =x

[One Winged Angel]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

qqwref's right, the replay looks much easier than the song actually is

[jimerax]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

k it's 84, nothing more or less I guess.

[stavie33]

Re: R1 - Actual Song Difficulties V2

Angel Island needs to be VC, 74, who the hell made it an FMO? That songs is sooo easy...much easier than Feldschlatt, nothing is hard in that song, trills aren't that bad, and the jacks are reasonable.

Astroid Run - 58, that song is a tricky VD

Devour - 88 or higher, that song is ridiculous, thanks again Xandertrax for making some of the ugliest patterns ever...lol, but seriously, that song has the ickiest 32nd notes I've ever seen.

Tribe Attacker - 56? That song isn't that bad, just kinda tricky iirc

XP Sound Attempt - 69? Other than the jacks, it's nothing bad

Caixa D'aqua - 70 highest, it's really easy minus one or two tricky parts (32nd trill), not that bad

Opinions?