03-28-2021, 12:54 AM | #1 |
Forever Derbyless
Join Date: Aug 2020
Age: 32
Posts: 240
|
Fun little coding experiment with ratings
Decided to take a little break from my studies and wrote up a Python script to rank players by "Top 100 Avg" ratings instead of skill ratings currently used to see how the ranks change. This is primarily done for fun so feel free to post here and see how you rank (searching top 1000 players took 2.5 hours for it to complete, so only D5+ players).
I thought this is interesting because it mainly accounts for all players who actively play sufficiently enough games on FFR to determine one's "comfort" skill level on a good day. For example, my current Top 100 Avg is 87.84. This says that on a good FFR day, I am comfortably able to AAA difficulty 87 - 88. In my opinion from my own gameplay experiences, this is much more accurate than what my recently achieved Level 92 states (it basically says that "on a very lucky day, I can AAA a difficulty 92"). Based on this, here are some fun facts: Assuming current division thresholds (i.e. D8 = 101+, D7 = 94+, D6 = 83+, D5 = 69+, etc.): No one qualifies for D8 (opposed to 25 players currently ranked D8) 28 people would be D7+ (opposed to 130 players currently ranked D7+) 156 people would be D6+ (opposed to 529 players currently ranked D6+) 572 people would be D5+ (opposed to 1671 players currently ranked D5+) Top 10 Highest Top 100 Average Ranked Players: Matthia: 100.64 TC_Halogen: 98.26 xXOpkillerXx: 98.0 Zoobin4: 97.88 Shxfted: 97.61 klimtkiller: 97.59 Mipha: 97.53 SoFast: 97.48 One Winged Angel: 97.05 XtraFestive: 96.9 22 people can comfortably get OWA Raged at Home Run Derby. 142 people can comfortably get St. Scarhand [Heavy]. 538 people can comfortably get Otaku Speedvibe [Oni]. Interesting results overall Enjoy and feel free to ask and see how you rank against others via Average Top 100 Ratings! EDIT: I think it should be possible to predict where other players who don't play enough games (like Myuka and AnMAO) fall in this ranking approach. Would be interesting to get one to play seriously and see how those predictions would shape out to be.
__________________
Last edited by WirryWoo; 03-28-2021 at 01:01 AM.. |
03-28-2021, 01:08 AM | #2 |
Boom.
Local FFR Person
Join Date: May 2019
Age: 21
Posts: 534
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
This is interesting stuff, would be cool to see where I place lol, maybe if possible get a spreadsheet up where we could just search ourselves and see where we are
__________________
|
03-28-2021, 01:33 AM | #3 |
🍍Pineapple Man🍍
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Pacific Timezone, USA Age: 22
Posts: 505
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
How long before I become the first ever qualifying D8 player for Top 100 Av Rank ;o
__________________
|
03-28-2021, 04:46 AM | #4 |
ᅠ
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,652
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
mathematics
__________________
|
03-28-2021, 01:29 PM | #5 |
has nice tits
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 744
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
My average is 69 something and has been for some time, yet it took me a million years to get Oni. Nerves are real.
I suspect no one qualifies for D8 simply because there aren't anywhere close to a hundred 101+ difficulty songs.
__________________
Last edited by XCV; 03-28-2021 at 01:34 PM.. |
03-28-2021, 11:20 PM | #6 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: On a mountain in a desert
Posts: 563
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
the most interesting thing to me is that the number of qualified players in each division is in the ballpark of the next lowest division average
__________________
aka mikey ----- |
03-28-2021, 11:37 PM | #7 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 135
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
|
05-26-2021, 06:30 AM | #8 |
D4
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 307
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
"EDIT: I think it should be possible to predict where other players who don't play enough games (like Myuka and AnMAO) fall in this ranking approach.”
problem is there aren’t enough songs in-game to decide this. |
05-26-2021, 07:32 AM | #9 |
✘ Forever OP✘
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada,Quebec
Age: 29
Posts: 4,171
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
Everybody (at a given level) has the same sample of files to play. If we enforce a minimum of 50 or 100 files to be played, we greatly minimize bias. Granted, the very top players will have to compete on a bunch of files that are significantly lower than their level, but there is no way around that if we want to keep the rest of the leaderboards accurate and fair.
|
05-26-2021, 07:53 AM | #10 |
Forever Derbyless
Join Date: Aug 2020
Age: 32
Posts: 240
|
Re: Fun little coding experiment with ratings
Hey all, this was initially for experimental purposes to see how relying on only unweighted Top 100 pans out. I can probably write a quick follow-up script to show these results too if there's interest.
Here's my proposed weighted setting that seems to be performing well so far: https://colab.research.google.com/dr...o=duy-96GtEK6b Please let me know if there are any questionable placements here. Thanks!
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|