Which one are you?

[noname219]

Originally Posted by Crazyjayde

Lol. Weren't you the one who told me I was being pretentious about mentioning BoH in my last post? :P You're kinda right though. At first, I was listening to uncommon music because I felt isolated from the mass. Now it's really just a matter of appreciating the structures and estheticism of the sound.

I think Bull of Heaven is conceptually incredible, but that's it. I see them as artists of the sound. Their statistics and numbers always have amazed me, but in a musical perspective, it just seems very bland.

Don't worry, I can be pretentious too.
Most of Bull of Heaven are indeed... empty and devoid of any life but there are some exceptions. (you can't make 400 albums without having 1-2 worth of interest)

143 has some pretty intense Noise/Stoner/Sludge passages. It's a pretty contrasting release and the variations of sounds are intricates.

123 is even better. The production takes a step for the better while some passages are probably the best I've ever heard from them. It's more progressive than their usual stuff and they were able to create a unique sound, between post-rock and drone.

[kommisar]

no chip music

I must be the most socially awkward person ever

[Spenner]

I REALLY wish I could find the spectrograph image my friend actually made, at the end of one of his electro songs it said "Hey Spenner" in the spectrograph :33 i'll post it if i can find it.

[Ohaider]

Venetian twin

[Arntonach]

Level 5, but now I find out about the level 8 stuff and they sound rather nice. Well I was never social to begin with anyways.

[danny53x]

Lot of interesting posts in this thread, loved them. Esp the quarter tone. The bull thing was kinda weird, seemed like some Guinness shenanigans.

welcome to level infinity+1
http://youtu.be/u7MvH1tbVBw

[Choofers]

Originally Posted by Spenner

Unless they mean field recordings of urban things

you really need to listen to this album
http://www.discogs.com/Thomas-K%C3%8...elease/1911268