Nuclear Launch Detected - Page 2

Deaths_Melancholy · 05-21-2006, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mead1

emo

At least my icon ain't a damn pokemon... DIE SQUIRTLE!!! I choose you... *pulls out an uzi* MUAHAHA

Deaths_Melancholy · 05-21-2006, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkManticoreX2

Ive got the same tag on brood war look me up sometime

Still that guys was a traitor!!! And yes that counts as saving cause if they didn't stall the zerg at the gate imagine the flow of zerg filing in and kill our fav DT. I'd rather kill a growing base then a base with an army. Meh I'll research the first question again...

What server are you on? I'm on USEast 98% of the time.

**DarkManticoreX2** · 05-21-2006, 09:04 PM

East as well

evilbutterfly · 05-25-2006, 11:44 AM

1) Whoever said that SC took less thinking than original C&C games: rofl idiot. -Craft games are about smaller armies and micromanagement, C&C games are about economics, build order, and MASSING TANKS. I like C&C because that is easier so I don't suck as much at it.
2) Generals was NOT C&C. EA just stuck the C&C name on it to sell more copies.
3) C&C: Tiberium Wars will have a 3rd side. Last time I checked, EA still won't release who it is. Might be the mutants from Tiberian Sun or the aliens that brought tiberium to Earth. *shrug*
4) And as for the campaigns being hard in C&C....if I remember correctly, the SC/WC2 games (around the same generation as old C&C games...all the new ones are piss easy) were just as hard if not harder than the C&C ones. Also, any Nod mission where you could either 1) build obelisks or 2) had stealth tanks were piss easy. The sandbag trick was rofl (build a line of sandbags to the enemy's base then build an obelisk at the end and have it rape their base), and I clearly remember one mission where I put a stealth tank in the back of their base and shot until I saw them coming, then I'd let it cloak again and their units would just walk away. I kept this up until everything in the back was dead. Easy as hell.
5) Seth: Let's attack America!
Kane: *shoots Seth* You're fired.
Me: rofl rofl rofl
6) Until C&C gets UMS maps, -Craft games will ALWAYS have something over C&C games. I love C&C's gameplay, but I love UMS maps.

Samineru · 05-25-2006, 12:11 PM

Has anyone else heard news of the World of Starcraft style game they're thinking of making? I think it would turn out somewhat similar to auto assault.

LightningSlash · 05-25-2006, 02:35 PM

Starcraft is old and boring. It was great when it came out but that was.... 7 years ago? Try elder scrolls oblivion or big red one.

**talisman** · 05-25-2006, 02:43 PM

starcraft is the ****...

also, ghost has been indefinitely postponed, and has been for a couple (maybe just one?) months now.

scorpio1690 · 05-25-2006, 04:55 PM

I liked StarCraft. It's one of those games that never gets old if you take breaks from it. I played UMS games on it all the time. I pwned Evolves, hands down. It had more diversity than C&C but I still likie C&C more. SC is harder I think, there's few missions in any C&C where a massive army won't win. In RA2 for instance, which I'm playing right now, the Soviets practically always win hands down if you know how. Power Plant<Ore Refinery<Barracks<War Factory<Radar<Battle Tower<Nuclear Power Plant<Cloning Vats. Seriously, cloning vats=t3h win. I don't build defenses, I build massive amounts of infantry. It's quicker defense too. Riflemen are dirt cheap at $100 a piece, with cloning vats it's two for one if you didn't know. So I'd make dozens and dozens of infantry, then flack troopers for air. I'm usually Iraq so I get the Desolators. Those too=t3h win. Instant infantry kills and if you situate enough of them within the enemy base and deploy their radiation the enemy can't build any units without them exploding or melting instantly. pillbox > desolator.

Oh and an actual tesla coil wouldn't work unless the enemy went around wearing armour made out of strong magnets.

Shock trooper online

Deaths_Melancholy · 05-25-2006, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scorpio1690

Oh and an actual tesla coil wouldn't work unless the enemy went around wearing armour made out of strong magnets.

Thats wat I wanted to hear! lmao Alrighty... time to make the people I hate wear magnets

-Jes- · 05-26-2006, 02:32 PM

Starcraft:Ghost has been indefinitely postponed and/or put off (as already stated) and is rumoured by Blizzard that it will be for next-gen consoles (PS3, 360, Wii), but i'm not sure which.

The game has been pushed back so many times, it'll be a cold day in hell before it's EVER released, to be honest with you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by joystiq

Blizzard has stated that it has indefinitely postponed production on StarCraft: Ghost while it evaluates "opportunities for utilizing the additional power of the new and upcoming console systems." In other words Blizzard wasn't happy with Ghost being released for current-gen consoles just as they were about to be replaced by bigger and better next-generation machines.

-Jes

**DarkManticoreX2** · 05-31-2006, 06:59 PM

in my sad opinion blizzard shouldn't make console games.

I think they keep seeing things come out and they say: "hey we wanna improve it again". But because this is a console game they cant patch it so they keep delaying the release to put in more addons. Which for starcraft loyalists (like me) makes it utterly gutwrenching.

05-25-2006, 11:44 AM	#24
evilbutterfly FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Small town, TN Age: 39 Posts: 5,784	Re: Nuclear Launch Detected 1) Whoever said that SC took less thinking than original C&C games: rofl idiot. -Craft games are about smaller armies and micromanagement, C&C games are about economics, build order, and MASSING TANKS. I like C&C because that is easier so I don't suck as much at it. 2) Generals was NOT C&C. EA just stuck the C&C name on it to sell more copies. 3) C&C: Tiberium Wars will have a 3rd side. Last time I checked, EA still won't release who it is. Might be the mutants from Tiberian Sun or the aliens that brought tiberium to Earth. shrug 4) And as for the campaigns being hard in C&C....if I remember correctly, the SC/WC2 games (around the same generation as old C&C games...all the new ones are piss easy) were just as hard if not harder than the C&C ones. Also, any Nod mission where you could either 1) build obelisks or 2) had stealth tanks were piss easy. The sandbag trick was rofl (build a line of sandbags to the enemy's base then build an obelisk at the end and have it rape their base), and I clearly remember one mission where I put a stealth tank in the back of their base and shot until I saw them coming, then I'd let it cloak again and their units would just walk away. I kept this up until everything in the back was dead. Easy as hell. 5) Seth: Let's attack America! Kane: shoots Seth You're fired. Me: rofl rofl rofl 6) Until C&C gets UMS maps, -Craft games will ALWAYS have something over C&C games. I love C&C's gameplay, but I love UMS maps. __________________ So I've gone completely slack-ass and haven't done any work on creating games. =( In less-depressing news, I got a job for an online business (which sells non-electronic games, of all things!) which has taught me a lot about marketing online and all that jazz. So now I'm on Twitter @NoahWright. And I write the blog for their website. Plus I do cool programming in-house that you'll never see. =O

05-25-2006, 12:11 PM	#25
Samineru FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2006 Age: 34 Posts: 122	Re: Nuclear Launch Detected Has anyone else heard news of the World of Starcraft style game they're thinking of making? I think it would turn out somewhat similar to auto assault.

05-25-2006, 02:35 PM	#26
LightningSlash FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 29	Re: Nuclear Launch Detected Starcraft is old and boring. It was great when it came out but that was.... 7 years ago? Try elder scrolls oblivion or big red one.

05-25-2006, 02:43 PM	#27
talisman Resident Penguin Join Date: May 2003 Age: 39 Posts: 4,598	Re: Nuclear Launch Detected starcraft is the ****... also, ghost has been indefinitely postponed, and has been for a couple (maybe just one?) months now.

05-25-2006, 04:55 PM	#28
scorpio1690 FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: canada eh? Age: 35 Posts: 4,817	Re: Nuclear Launch Detected I liked StarCraft. It's one of those games that never gets old if you take breaks from it. I played UMS games on it all the time. I pwned Evolves, hands down. It had more diversity than C&C but I still likie C&C more. SC is harder I think, there's few missions in any C&C where a massive army won't win. In RA2 for instance, which I'm playing right now, the Soviets practically always win hands down if you know how. Power Plant<Ore Refinery<Barracks<War Factory<Radar<Battle Tower<Nuclear Power Plant<Cloning Vats. Seriously, cloning vats=t3h win. I don't build defenses, I build massive amounts of infantry. It's quicker defense too. Riflemen are dirt cheap at $100 a piece, with cloning vats it's two for one if you didn't know. So I'd make dozens and dozens of infantry, then flack troopers for air. I'm usually Iraq so I get the Desolators. Those too=t3h win. Instant infantry kills and if you situate enough of them within the enemy base and deploy their radiation the enemy can't build any units without them exploding or melting instantly. pillbox > desolator. Oh and an actual tesla coil wouldn't work unless the enemy went around wearing armour made out of strong magnets. Shock trooper online

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)