|
|
#36 | |
|
Spun a twirly fruitcake,
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 33
Posts: 3,876
|
as a bit of visualization for my approach
![]() in case I: you take a number from 1-5 twice, so I put the 2 numbers as seperate axes the squares show how many times the number is the highest you can see that the occurrences of number N are N squared minus (N-1) squared aka: n^2 - (n-1)^2 same in case III where I put it as 3 axes and the occurrences of N are N cubed minus (N-1) cubed aka: n^3 - (n-1)^3 case II is where I multiplied the occurrences of case I by the weight of the number obviously I can't visualize the same for case III as it would be a 4d shape at this point I've done n(n^2-(n-1)^2) for case II so I did a summation for all the numbers N to get the sum of all amounts with that sum I now have to divide it by the amount of combinations, which is just the size of case I I tried "re-ordering the blocks" so they'd fit neatly inside eachother, but that doesn't seem to have a simple way (pretty obvious since the averages are decimal numbers) for the latest rewritten formula I approached it like this: take case I, make it one dimension greater, so it's [the highest number]^3, then subtract the sum of the smaller numbers squared (*1 to make it little cubes, but that's redundant) so... summarized average is ( [the highest number] to the power of ([amount of times you take a number] + 1) minus the sum of [all smaller numbers] to the power of [amount of times you take a number] ) divided by [the highest number] to the power of [amount of times you take a number] average = ( [k] ^ ([m]+1) - sigma [from n=0 to n = k-1] of n ^ [m]) / k^m also to be written as ... no idea if that helps, just having fun you can see my steps, maybe go a different route
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by SKG_Scintill; 07-27-2017 at 10:33 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|