07-12-2014, 11:38 PM | #261 | |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 84
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Quote:
|
|
07-12-2014, 11:42 PM | #262 | |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 42
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Quote:
Might help you to be more clear as you are top lynch material. |
|
07-12-2014, 11:43 PM | #263 | |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 84
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Quote:
You gave one elaborate read and then five without any backing; like you're trying to slip them in or some shit. Also buried a top lynch target into the ground. |
|
07-12-2014, 11:49 PM | #264 | |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Quote:
|
|
07-12-2014, 11:49 PM | #265 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 47
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
|
07-13-2014, 12:04 AM | #266 | |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Quote:
It's basically been people going on and on about Hans and me for the same things over and over. I wouldn't say that's really all that much discussion going on. I felt it could help if we had some confident reads on people considering most of us know how people play certain roles. But that's fine, we need something else to discuss though cause it's just beating a dead horse at this point with the other discussion. |
|
07-13-2014, 12:04 AM | #267 | ||||||
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 64
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, it sprouted conversation, but I feel like you have potential to manipulate the villains since you're the one that started it. Your other posts also have hints of leading in them: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
07-13-2014, 12:19 AM | #268 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 42
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Why are you afraid of having an opinion, Hans? Like at this point this isn't me connecting the dots to infer a conclusion it's pretty clear you're deliberately not taking a stance on anything.
Like I get having cognitive dissonance in this game but what I don't currently understand is how you can be under so much heat and not have any of your emotions trigger responses towards the people voting you. If you are human it baffles me that you would be getting bussed this hard this early and not find anyone bussing you as opportunistic or shallow in their reasoning... |
07-13-2014, 12:26 AM | #269 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 42
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
And I guess it didn't come across clear enough but I'm purposefully taking a dominant role in this phase, so you haven't connected that to what you find suspicious about it only pointing out what was probably obvious to everyone.
|
07-13-2014, 12:28 AM | #270 |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Vote Count: (11 to insta)
: : : : : : : : :
__________________
Last edited by Xiz; 07-13-2014 at 12:53 AM.. |
07-13-2014, 12:29 AM | #271 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 64
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
I'm guessing my thoughts for the last two pages are not opinions?
I already said I don't have a lead, all the votes currently on me are from people that have stated that I'm not being useful which is probably just an attempt to go for an easy target. Honestly, I'm not worried about these votes on me, they're just prods to get me to say something (which I'm doing right now, thank you) and we have more than 24 hours. It would be silly to keep the votes on me for the entire duration. |
07-13-2014, 12:33 AM | #272 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 68
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
@Xiz I voted for Hook, not Hans.
|
07-13-2014, 12:34 AM | #273 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 64
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Did I say it was suspicious? I said I don't like it because of what I stated. It's a concern which I can see you doing later to intimidate remaining players at your whim.
|
07-13-2014, 12:34 AM | #274 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 42
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
So an opinion in this game is feeling someone is disingenuous and stating that clearly with support
What you are stating is watery facts. You say that people are going for an easy target, and to me that seems like the opportunism a wolf might latch onto, but you haven't looked at a single vote on you and thought "well that is bullshit?" Instead you're thoughts are "I'm willing to read this game and post long-multi quotes and defenses but fuck if I'm going to think about what is going on right now!" What got you interested in TWG? What drives you to play it? |
07-13-2014, 12:38 AM | #275 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 42
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
You made a full post casting doubts on it and it's long term potential. We aren't playing the semantics game we are playing the intentions game.
|
07-13-2014, 12:44 AM | #276 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 64
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Yeah, it is my intention to let everyone know what I think about you taking a leader position.
I'm also totally setting up to take you down later with that post too! (Controversy folks!) Quote this later ladies |
07-13-2014, 12:48 AM | #277 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 91
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Sort of messy sorry, going to bed now. The blank ones I will get to tomorrow, I promise. Don't have much for reds, as I'm focused on weird shit with people that could be green:
Auto - When you pointed out the contradiction by Clayton regarding saying about knowing who people are, I was interested. Wasn't aware that the first post you quoted was actually second. So you quote out of order to get shit on people and then disappear? Weird. Captain Hook - Ignore Cruella/Scar business and say you're not going to post anything. Attempting to defend himself by saying the same stuff over and over even though it's not explaining anything at all and showing he's either not reading or not understanding anything he has read. Complaining about people not voting for hypocrites, laughed and quoted somebody saying voting for hypocrites is dumb when Hook got called a hypocrite back. Not to mention now you're whining about people 'not reading' when you have yet to do the same properly. Posting that people are jumping on you for not doing anything when it's brought up that people should vote for present people rather than inactives. Maybe you should do something then rather than complaining about it. I agree with Clayton regarding "His game is fearsome and defensive, which probably just means he's newish, but we don't have much else to go by", but I'm leaning hero rather than newbie, or better possibility, newbie hero. Reading through more, continuing to complain about people voting him and not making one effort to fix that. "At this point I feel like Sydrome may be a hero because he's been zero'd in on me", when I stated that I didn't have anything on anybody else yet because I wasn't home to read through the thread and write thoughts. More not reading when he's on people for 'not reading'. "It isn't 11 pages of content that is useful though. Some of it is some of it isn't. Every player has their own way of playing and dragging information out. Mine doesn't have to be the same as others." The thing is, you aren't doing any playing or dragging information out, so you can't talk shit on what's been going on because others have been able to do just fine with what we have now. "Do we not want to get inactive people active? I forgot, we're just supposed to let people fly UTR the whole game and literally not look at them at all." But you aren't really being active and you're getting mad at people for voting you. Later on acting like you are giving up and resorting to calling others lazy when they call you out on continuing to play like shit. Clayton - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise Cruella De Vil - Your "I swear I'm not evil" post is weird and when Scar calls you out on it, you vote for him. I don't think calling out odd posts is 'fishy'. Coming on strong and shittalking when attempting to defend, even though you are the one being called out for acting fishy. http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=174 is kinda villainy to me though. I'm not sure yet, reading through more I'm more inclined to say villain (oddly), but still kind of null. Darla - Thoughts regarding Sid and http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=249 make me feel like you are a villain. Not for sure though. Dr. Facilier - Switching votes and nothing else. Just two posts with nothing of value. Gaston - Early on, switching votes around to people not posting, and that's it. No other words with it, just votes. Weird thing though, people you vote for talk a tiny bit after you vote for them, but they don't say much at all and then kind of disappear. Maybe you're a hero and you're on a newbie team? Put a vote on them to make them post and not be UTR but they don't know how to do much else? You're not really doing anything useful either though, so I'm still not sure. Hades - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise Jafar - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise Maleficent - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise Prince Hans - "Didn't know I should be shit smearing on someone with literally no flip presented" Kinda weird. What else are you supposed to do? There's no flips presented for anybody. So are you just wanting to do nothing? Agreeing with Yzma about not discussing a variety of stuff this phase. Seems to hurt us rather than the heroes imo. Not really seeing what you are when you say Cruella is leading. Randall Boggs - Gave excuse for being absent for a bit, said you didn't like Hans, and then nothing else. Just the two posts. Scar - Will get to tomorrow when I'm not tired, I promise. I can say now though that I think he is a villain. Shan Yu - Slight villain read due to posts like http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=215. Not doing much of anything else as I see but nothing fishy compared to others currently. Shere Khan - YOU HAVEN'T POSTED ANYTHING AT ALL. Even TWG Canada has done more than you. Sid Phillips - Contradictory. Saying voting on Hook is unproductive and siding with him. Later telling Hook to shut up about what's going on regarding him and arguing with Hook about his hypocrisy playing. I agree with you now currently though rather than how you started out. Villain for now. Syndrome - Villain The Queen - YOU HAVEN'T POSTED ANYTHING AT ALL. Even TWG Canada has done more than you. Ursula - States Scar is jumping over minor stuff and votes for him, but doesn't explain what the minor things are, no backing. "I don't know if Clayton is a human or a wolf but man his posts are A+ so I probably won't vote for him today. Thin wolf lean just for his behavior." HOW? Make post like http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=263 when you are doing the same thing. Yzma - "Gut feeling for hero between Cruella and Scar, if there is one, would be scar" I know you said gut, but is there anything that is making you lean more scar? Anything you could say to somewhat back it up would be nice. http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...&postcount=148 is dumb. Your explanation of that post is big and fancy, but reading it through, doesn't seem all that smart and still has a bigger chance of harming the villains rather than heroes. |
07-13-2014, 12:48 AM | #278 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 91
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Missing some stuff from last page most likely.
|
07-13-2014, 12:49 AM | #279 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 42
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Why should they quote that for later?
|
07-13-2014, 12:54 AM | #280 |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
I'm bad at vote counts. Sorry. Fixed <3
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|