Moron owned

[talisman]

I would love to see jon stewart go on all these guys' show and own them like he did tucker carlson... it would make me feel warm and fuzzy inside.

[Mindfields]

Originally Posted by djshox

I watch FOX News just to get a good laugh every now and then.

Otherwise I never have taken it seriously, considering it's only entertainment.

Exactly.
If it weren't for 24 and House, the whole channel is just a bunch of people trying to act serious AND funny. Now, House, at some times, is funny. Everything on FOX is a horrible show because I think they're a bunch of crap-for-brains who are trying to keep up with the modern generation. This said, I now don't respect House half as much as I used to.
Damn. I liked that show.

[GuidoHunter]

Originally Posted by Mindfields

Exactly.
If it weren't for 24 and House, the whole channel is just a bunch of people trying to act serious AND funny.

::slaps forehead:: SIIIIIIIIIIGH. Way to make a fool of yourself, Mind.

For the record (and the slow): FOX News =/= FOX

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[AlbinoLime]

Can somebody please explain to me what the soldiers in Iraq are defending me from?

[Matthew4444]

Originally Posted by Cenright

The guy mixes his arguments, and it ruins his debate. He is egotistical. He thinks he knows everything, and has seen all he needs to see. Anyone else just doesn't have his superior insight on the matter, and so they all are there to screw him up. Nothing will change him, nothing will teach him otherwise. Even if someone sat down and tried to show him other insights, without trying to debate it, he would try to shut you down, because he feels he already has the superior information, and you just don't understand it. This is the problem with morons who think they know everything.

I know you were referring to Michael Crook, but this clip portrays Hannity the exact same way. Hannity seemed to think that Crook didn't have any sound logic to back up his opinions, so he didn't even give Crook time to speak. The irony is though that without being given any substancial pieces of evidence, many viewers have probably already formed their own logic to justify Crook's opinions.

I can sort of see the logic behind Crook's arguement. Since the troops volunteer, they know the benefits they are receiving when they sign up. Since these benefits don't seem to be sufficient, people should pretty much boycott the military so that these benefits are raised to a much better level. His nastier arguements are basically saying that it's the soldiers' fault for being so stupid, so they should suffer for their own stupidity.

While I don't agree with that logic, I really couldn't help forming ideas like that.