Problems with the Big Bang theory

[perkeyone]

Originally Posted by Dark Ronin

You also had several other mistakes such as misplaced commas as well as spaces that simply shouldn’t have been there, but you apologized and so I will to. To be fair you had maybe 3 grammar errors at most and a few typing errors that anyone could make. No hard feelings, I just don’t think you had the right to show up out of nowhere and start making fun of people. If you’re going to be here for awhile try typing things up on a word processor, or maybe it was just a one time deal. I get rushed sometimes too and don’t make much sense, it happens. You do appear intelligent so good luck with posting; I like people who oppose my views anyway. It gives me something to work against so I can be more precise.

No hard feelings here either.
I know exactly what you are talking about and the word processor thing is almost a necessity. I don’t know how many times I’ve typed up a huge well thought out paragraph only to have it vanish forever when I mess up a copy paste or press back and go to a new page.
Oh and I love an intelligent debate too.

Originally Posted by Dark Ronin

So you’re basically saying that we are on a set path? That god or something created a set timeline and we are simply following along it? I may be misinterpreting what you’re trying to say, but if it is a limit then it must be on a set line which I assume is time. Then you go on to say the present frame has a forward motion. So you’re saying that this is the one time. There is no forward or backwards in time only the present, but this present is still moving along a track of sorts, predefined by the "function" on the set "graph" of life. If that’s what you mean then I simply can’t agree. If everything is predetermined, then there must be infinite periods of time in which one could move forward or back. .

I didn’t really mean it to be interpreted that closely to the definition of a limit.
It was mostly just an analogy to describe the forward “motion” (for lack of a better term) of time.

Originally Posted by Dark Ronin

There is not another section of space for ever section. It has been proven (as well as we can prove it) that there is a definite end to the universe and it is constantly expanding and contracting. Actually I'm pretty sure I've been through this earlier in the thread. .

I don’t see why not...
And how can they prove the nonexistence of things beyond the universe?
If a person could reach the end of the universe what would stop them from going past it?

Originally Posted by Dark Ronin

I have always understood black holes to be nothing more than dead stars. They compress all matter and light to a point where it might not even exist anymore. Theories of black holes connecting the multiverse are common. I particularly like the one which states that black holes absorb time itself; allowing one to travel through time or dimensions. Of course we all know it’s much more likely that everything is just compressed and anyone or anything who tries to pass through it would die a very gruesome death. I admit my knowledge might me limited, but all the information I do have comes from scientific journals. Things of this nature have always fascinated me. If you could find an article or something that I could read over in regards to the whole black hole thing, I'd appreciate it.

Yeah black holes are pretty interesting.
Ill have to get back to you though I'm a bit preoccupied and i would like to be more focused during such a conversation.