Problems with the Big Bang theory

[perkeyone]

After reading about one and a half pages of this thread, I have come to the conclusion that about half of the posts have been made simply to give the illusion that the poster is intelligent. (They failed horribly in my eyes.)

On the topic...

Originally Posted by Dark Ronin

I have struggled with theories for creation for one reason, because they all start with something. How can anything come from nothing, is nothing a meaningful word in creation theories? I find it totally illogical that nothing existed before creation. The best I can come up with for a pseudo nothing is two forces that cancel each other. Our existence must prove that absolute nothing is impossible?

I have my own personal belief. It is not exactly a "creation theory" but rather an "existence theory"and it has these key points:
There was no beginning of the uni(multi)verse. It has always existed.
The big bang occurred and spawned the/our universe.
The big bang's singularity came from a "super massive black hole" that had reached a "critical mass" of some sort. The black hole was the end result of a previous universe.
The end of our universe will be the same as the previous one... a super massive black hole... and then a new universe will be created.
There have been an infinite number of universes created and destroyed in this manner.

An argument that on may have against this concept is that in order for it to be true then there would be an infinite past. An infinite past means that and infinite number of years have occurred, which is theoretically impossible. However, it makes sense to me when I change the perspective from "an infinite number of years have occurred" to " an infinite number of years are occurring".