Weird Theories about everything.

[FlynnMac]

Gold stinger cannot handle the sheer intellect people within this thread provide thus he believes it is a bad thread

[Andrew WCY]

Originally Posted by FlynnMac

Gold stinger cannot handle the sheer intellect people within this thread provide thus he believes it is a bad thread

Some theories are unfortunately perceived as terrible to people no matter how sensible they sound. Everything is subject to the scrutiny of subjectivity and personal bias in the world of theory and thought.
but yes this is bad thread because most of you guys just write a few sentences and expect us to keel over and be amazed at how thoughtful you are

[Travis_Flesher]

I find weird theories to be extremely interesting, and never too unbelievable. And I know many others that feel the same way. It isn't a subject to be a skeptic or naysayer about. Either you're all for it, or too bad.

[gold stinger]

Originally Posted by Andrew WCY

Some theories are unfortunately perceived as terrible to people no matter how sensible they sound. Everything is subject to the scrutiny of subjectivity and personal bias in the world of theory and thought.
but yes this is bad thread because most of you guys just write a few sentences and expect us to keel over and be amazed at how thoughtful you are

It's because in the definition of theory, it is meant to be a system of ideas intended to explain something that would otherwise be unexplained. Your theory in here has some level of ideas for something that would otherwise be unexplained. Everything else in here is either flat out wrong, belief, or doesn't have any system of idea backing it up beyond a statement.

If you want to make a theory beyond something like this:

Originally Posted by Travis_Flesher

Future gasoline is made from collecting and distilling the alcohol gases that evaporate from feces.

Then give me some reasons why you think or believe this is the case (a.k.a, give me some content to critically think about).


example:

To push in a different direction from andrew's theory, it's fact that brains are largely responsible for memory. We also know that when you die, you are technically still alive for a brief amount of time, but un-aware of it. I think it's possible that if you die, and your body goes through the cycle of life extremely quickly (we're talking cells in the body being broken down, re-used for energy, and possibly that energy going into breeding, human or not) it might be possible that those memories or at least the way a muscle or brain 'fires' neurons (kind of like how if you shake salt on frog legs the muscles contract & expand) can translate to another being. I mean, you're physically moving cells from one being to another when eating meat all the time, cells DO contain DNA & stuff we can't fully grasp as well. The difference is how quickly that cycle of life happens, and would explain a lot of situations of people having memories from past lives. Since an example could be like:

>Someone drowns in an ocean
>Fish eat the body
>Someone pregnant eats said fish
>pregnant human delivers baby
>baby somehow contains memories from someone in the 1990's

Pulled this example from an actual story that was ran back in 2006: https://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=132381&page=1

[Andrew WCY]

Originally Posted by gold stinger

It's because in the definition of theory, it is meant to be a system of ideas intended to explain something that would otherwise be unexplained.

I know that lol. I'm just stating the obvious is all.

[Travis_Flesher]

Originally Posted by gold stinger

Then give me some reasons why you think or believe this is the case (a.k.a, give me some content to critically think about).

For example, I have seen real UFOs in the sky on numerous occasions. During those occasions, I stopped what I was doing and watched them intently. Each sighting was of different kinds of UFOs with different flight patterns and details. I am very interested in this topic, watching numerous documentaries over the years, and I am personal friends with many other folks and members of the UFO community. Thus, anyone who says we're full of hogwash is being a spoilsport.

I hope you understand my explanation.

[gold stinger]

Originally Posted by Travis_Flesher

For example, I have seen real UFOs in the sky on numerous occasions. During those occasions, I stopped what I was doing and watched them intently. Each sighting was of different kinds of UFOs with different flight patterns and details. I am very interested in this topic, watching numerous documentaries over the years, and I am personal friends with many other folks and members of the UFO community. Thus, anyone who says we're full of hogwash is being a spoilsport.

I hope you understand my explanation.

Alright, so are all of them completely unidentified here? Or have you also seen planes/helicopters and shrugged them off as such?
Which would you say you've seen or noticed more of (identifiable vs unidentifiable)?
Have you tried deducing/tracking down exactly what you saw? There's a couple websites out there that help you check overhead air traffic like https://www.flightradar24.com/ or https://flightaware.com/

[Travis_Flesher]

No comment. UFO-ology is one of many pseudo sciences, and the information about it is difficult to obtain, or find very easily, due to the nature of it. But yes, they are alien aircraft.

[gold stinger]

Originally Posted by Travis_Flesher

No comment. UFO-ology is one of many pseudo sciences, and the information about it is difficult to obtain, or find very easily, due to the nature of it. But yes, they are alien aircraft.

I mean, I'm just asking regarding what you've personally experienced, not what UFO-ology has to say about it as a whole. Like sure, if that's your belief then by all means stick to your guns on it. No qualms about that. Just hard to accept & albeit a little annoying to 'probe' (haha ufo joke) for truth or perspective on the subject when you do get a chance to ask questions about a worldview that you don't necessarily share and get shut down.