Re: Apparently, I've been sheltered from typical teens on the Internet
No. If you'd read my OP more carefully, you would see that I was merely commenting on how widespread chatspeak has become, and was hoping to initiate discussion on the subject.
If you'd read some of my posts in the thread more carefully, you would see that that isn't what I'm saying either. I explicitly stated that a person's typing style of choice doesn't affect their intelligence, but rather, many people may consider someone who uses chat speak to be less intelligent than someone who types formally.
I also remarked on the correlation between formality of posts and content quality. I don't believe that formality causes an increase in content quality, but rather, those that can create posts with better quality are often the ones who type formally. The reverse isn't necessarily true though; people who type formally aren't always the ones who make posts with high content quality.
If that's the case, you shouldn't be talking to five different people at once if you want any sort of meaningful discussion, exactly for the reason that it's too difficult to read, come up with a meaningful response of your own, and type it if you're talking to so many people.
And this just bewilders me. I'm "trying too hard to be smart?" This is exactly how I always communicate, online and off. This is me speaking normally.
And I never once claimed that I'm better than everyone else. Once again, the whole point of this thread was to initiate discussion on the use of chatspeak, based on the realization that chatspeak is used far more frequently than I previously imagined.
I agree; a small number of abbreviations are acceptable in informal situations, such as "cause" or "cuz," short for "because." Just not in excess, like what I've been seeing.
No. If you'd read my OP more carefully, you would see that I was merely commenting on how widespread chatspeak has become, and was hoping to initiate discussion on the subject.
Originally posted by MrMatt106
I also remarked on the correlation between formality of posts and content quality. I don't believe that formality causes an increase in content quality, but rather, those that can create posts with better quality are often the ones who type formally. The reverse isn't necessarily true though; people who type formally aren't always the ones who make posts with high content quality.
Originally posted by MrMatt106
Originally posted by MrMatt106
And I never once claimed that I'm better than everyone else. Once again, the whole point of this thread was to initiate discussion on the use of chatspeak, based on the realization that chatspeak is used far more frequently than I previously imagined.
Originally posted by da_headhunter





Comment