okay you didn't make any of that clear you just went from the sentence "Decent target" to "moot point" and i was particularly interested in your choice of tokzic given the frequency that his name had come up in the posts leading up to the one you made
yeah this is not the point you fucking mercurial shitserpent the point is you need to get your hands dirty every single day if we're to get anywhere and not in this half-assed noncomittal way otherwise this bullshit "nothing" you're complaining about is the problem you're actively contributing i'm not a ghandi fan by if you make me i will quote him
okay you didn't make any of that clear you just went from the sentence "Decent target" to "moot point" and i was particularly interested in your choice of tokzic given the frequency that his name had come up in the posts leading up to the one you made
so who do you think you would kill in 9 hours?
if the choice was all mine
I think there's one between manti and blind so probably blind... misfiring on Manti is worse than misfiring on blind
my other reads are pretty shitty
I don't know if this is good practice to kill off inactives early, but maybe fojar if that was a decent move
Originally posted by Moogy
no one cares
Originally posted by TWG Dan Hedgehog
there are 743 matches for hedgehog suicide on deviantart
that's kind of a sad statistic
Hi tokzic, skimming the thread revealed that you are voting for DBP. Maybe that is why you're assuming I'm defending dabackpack? I'm not trying to defend anyone, I'm pointing out that every single vote I've noticed here doesn't really provide enough fruitful evidence that someone is red - and that's the point I was trying to communicate to V before he was rude to me in front of all these people. I don't think there are compelling reasons to vote for anyone so I'm giving my vote away or not voting at all.
Even if I reveal my reads I feel they aren't substantiated enough to warrant sharing or even bother analyzing. Like, reads based on past game behavior isn't a good measure of someone's role - V and I are examples of why this isn't the case. Vote switching on d1 isn't a good measure of whether or not someone is a role, it's really an excuse to add pressure on someone to get them to talk.
he spent a huge chunk of the day posturing around as the master of reading me without commenting on anything else, and he did that to gain authority and confidence but after starting off strong he cooled down the actual content of his "read" as his language got more grandiose
then when asked to contribute he actively says "i'm not going to contribute day 1 or 2" which is like "sure, yeah, you're fucking the infamous fiction you can do weird wolfy shit and people will let it slide as thought it's some sort of Mark z danielewski house play" but i'm going to read what you're doing on a primitive basic level and say that it's straight wolfy
early posturing, early pocketing of a veteran player you're worried about, and then refusing to commit to the exercise of the village. there's no vantage you can present this from that makes any of that not seem pretty wolfy
Comment