While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~

[YoshL]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

101 ok? .-.

[One Winged Angel]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

The record was broken, just by 100 less than people think it was (I think...)

Five back-to-back mod posts = should've started at 401, not 501, unless I've misinterpreted the rules

Also 202 or something idk

[Untimely Friction]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

Yeah you did screw that one up OWA, I was gonna call you out, but did not, there were 5 consecutive posts which in theory yess should have started at 401, and I forget what the highest count was, but I think it was 630ish prolly a little higher, if it's over 634 then officially it's 534(Or higher) due to what OWA said, now lets stop this crap and play the game normally, they get to hundreds solo sometimes we dont need to help them anymore

303

[One Winged Angel]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

hey I didn't start the count don't yell at me (404?)

actually next number is 402 I think, mods just add 100 straight without our posts counting as one...idk this game is confusing and resetting is dumb pls get to 1,000 ppl

[clasko1000]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

405 Morning guys!!

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

Zero.

0

Stop breaking the game.

[Untimely Friction]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

Manticore you FOOOL YOU BROKE IT

600 go

[clasko1000]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

601 legit

[YoshL]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

602 waaahhah

[Untimely Friction]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

00 finally go away

Edit: YoshL posted 602 before my 0 then message was deleted, thats not cool. OWA if you deleted that that's not cool and you're kinda ruining the thread for me at this point... If it wasn't you sorry however, YoshL ya cheater

[YoshL]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

702 (lol i'm a cheater)


1

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

The fact that there's two moderators in here that can't read 3 rules that are a sentence or less long is pathetic.

The rule you and OWA have been wrongfully reading this entire morning (and for god knows how long) specifically states

Additional Rules:
-You must wait for at least two additional posts (either score adding or score resetting posts) to be posted before you can post again. This is to prevent 2-person tag teaming. Any moderator that breaks this rule add's 100 to the current score as opposed to resetting it.

Note the word You it's the first word of the sentence. This specifically designates that one poster (moderator or otherwise) has to wait 2 posts before he/she can post again.

It does not say "All moderators have to wait 2 posts after a reset". It says specifically "You" singular. One person. Then it goes on to state that any moderator (again, singular) who breaks this rule adds 100.

So if I post twice in a row, they get a free 100 count.
If I post, UF posts, and I posts again, they get a free 100 count.
If I post, UF posts, OWA posts and I post again, they just got 0 chained, they get no free 100 counts. They stay at 0, they don't go to 300. None of us broke the 2 post delay rule.

[One Winged Angel]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

Nice try yoshl...not resetting anything here, just restoring the post so start at w.e it's at

Also manti that's what I'd initially interpreted the rule as when I first started posting in here but I was told otherwise about 10 pages back (prior to the 0, 00, 000 crap)...not that I really care I mean lol this is a thread where people just come in to post numbers lol lighten up guys. I'm done boosting the non-mods anyways.

[YoshL]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

lol, i already edited the other post, i don't even know what's going on anymore

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: While the Moderators Sleep... ~2013 Remix~ ($)

OWA, UF, Axith was wrong.

Posts 549/550

Posts 862/864/866/868

Posts 875/876

Posts 1882/1884

These are all examples of it working the way I mentioned. some of them very close to the start of the thread when Ben actually was reveiwing it.

There's even a zero chain in posts 2631, 2632, and 2633